Green Development Management Studies

Green Development Management Studies

Analyzing the Physical-Spatial Development of Ahvaz through the Lens of Ecological Infrastructure and Green City Principles

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
2 PhD student in Geography and Urban Planning, Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
Abstract
Introduction
Rapid urbanization over the past few decades has fundamentally reshaped the physical, environmental, and social fabric of Ahvaz, often at the cost of long-term ecological resilience. Characterized by unchecked spatial expansion, a disproportionate concentration of socio-economic activities within the city core, deteriorating air and water quality, and the persistent decline of urban green space, Ahvaz faces profound challenges that signal a deviation from sustainable development trajectories. In response, this research adopts the paradigms of “Green City” and “Ecological City” as strategic frameworks to reconceptualize and reorganize urban growth. The primary objective is to critically evaluate the historical physical-spatial development patterns of Ahvaz while identifying optimal zones for future expansion toward the 1420 planning horizon. By bridging the gap between urban green management and ecological planning, this study underscores the necessity of achieving balanced spatial distribution—a critical prerequisite for mitigating environmental degradation, curbing urban hazards, and fostering urban resilience. Ultimately, this research aims to provide a robust, evidence-based roadmap for stakeholders to pivot away from ecologically costly expansion and toward a model that prioritizes spatial justice and the quality of urban life.
 
Methodology
This study adopts an applied, descriptive-analytical research design characterized by an exploratory approach to mapping the physical-spatial development of Ahvaz. To ensure a comprehensive assessment of sustainable development potential, a multidimensional set of natural and environmental criteria was synthesized through an extensive literature review, expert consultation, and the integration of organizational datasets, subsequently digitized into geographic information layers. Given the inherent heterogeneity of urban and environmental data, the study employed Fuzzy Logic to standardize variables and mitigate uncertainty, followed by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to rigorously weight criteria, ensuring consistency through an audited compatibility rate. The final phase involved integrating these weighted layers within a Geographic Information System (GIS) environment via spatial overlay analysis. This methodology yields a high-precision land suitability zoning map, facilitating an integrated analysis that allows for the identification of zones where physical development is intrinsically compatible with ecological preservation principles.
 
Findings
The analytical output of this research classifies potential expansion areas into five distinct suitability zones, ranging from “very high” to “very low” capacity for physical growth. By synthesizing natural features with regional development variables, the findings reveal a clear spatial bifurcation in the city’s growth potential. Specifically, the most promising prospects for sustainable expansion are concentrated in the northwest and southwest corridors. In contrast, expansion toward the northeast, and certain sectors of the north and south, are significantly constrained by complex environmental and anthropogenic factors. These spatial limitations include critical intersections with heavy industrial complexes, high-value agricultural lands, sensitive riparian zones along the river, and the encroaching development of Kot Abdullah. This zoning map acts as a vital tool for urban planners, delineating where growth can proceed with minimal ecological friction and where protectionist policies are mandatory to prevent further urban sprawl.
 
Discussion and Conclusion
This study provides a rigorous evaluation of the physical-spatial development of Ahvaz through the lens of ecological urbanism, leveraging ten natural and geographical indicators to simulate four distinct development scenarios up to the year 1420. The spatial analysis indicates that approximately 25% of the surrounding land possesses high to very high suitability for development, with the third scenario emerging as the most viable trajectory; unlike the fragmented expansion inherent in the first two scenarios, the third offers an integrated growth pattern in the northwest and southwest that preserves ecological continuity. Realizing an “eco-city” in Ahvaz necessitates a paradigm shift from an economy-oriented growth model to one grounded in environmental responsibility, requiring redefined urban metrics, reformed zoning policies, and heightened public awareness regarding climate risks. In conclusion, the findings advocate for a transformative approach to spatial planning that reinforces green infrastructure and adheres to ecological principles. The proposed model suggests that a balanced, environmentally sensitive development strategy can transcend traditional urbanization, functioning as a restorative mechanism that generates energy, ensures food security, and enhances environmental health, thereby positioning Ahvaz on a clear path toward becoming a sustainable, 21st-century urban ecosystem.
Keywords
Subjects

Arseh Consulting Engineers. (2009). Strategic development and development plan (comprehensive) of Ahvaz City, first phase, first section: Basic studies and prerequisites for basic knowledge and area of influence.
Arseh Consulting Engineers. (2012). Strategic development and development plan (comprehensive) of Ahvaz City, second phase, third section: Integration of studies and final analysis using SWOT method.
Bahrami Seifabad, M., Azizi, J., & Hojjat Doost, S. (2014). Investigating the effect of knowledge seeking and knowledge creation on green supply chain management with the moderating role of knowledge utilization and the mediating role of green self-efficacy: Companies in industrial parks in Yasuj city. Environment and Cross-Sectoral Development, 7(75), 68–80. https://sid.ir/paper/1044839/fa
Bibri, S. E. (2018). Smart sustainable cities of the future: The untapped potential of big data analytics and context aware computing for advancing sustainability. Springer. https://www.planninginsights.co.in/data/ebook/1625564553.pdf
Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2020). The emerging data-driven smart city and its innovative applied solutions for sustainability: The cases of London and Barcelona. Energy Informatics, 3(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-020-00108-6
Chotchaiwong, P., & Wijitkosum, S. (2019). Predicting urban expansion and urban land use changes in Nakhon Ratchasima City using a CA-Markov model under two different scenarios. Land, 8(9), Article 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8090140
Deng, L., et al. (2021). Comparison of protein and peptide fractionation approaches in protein identification and quantification from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, 1162, Article 122453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2020.122453
Deputy of Planning and Development of Ahvaz Municipality. (2012). Statistics of Ahvaz metropolitan city. Public Relations and International Affairs Publications of Ahvaz Municipality.
Downton, P. F. (2009). Ecopolis: Architecture and cities for a changing climate (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8496-6
Duan, C., Shi, P., Song, M., Zhang, X., Zong, N., & Zho, C. (2020). Land use and land cover change in the Kailash Sacred Landscape of China. Sustainability, 11(6), Article 1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061788
Esfandiari, F., & Qarachoorloo, M. (2018). Feasibility study of physical expansion of Sarab city in relation to natural factors. Geography and Regional Urban Planning, 8(28), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2018.4101
Fajr Toseeh Consulting Engineers. (2012). Studies of dilapidated texture and empowerment of Ahvaz City neighborhoods (Level one: Strategic studies). Ahvaz Improvement and Renovation Organization.
Gaffron, P., Huismans, G., Skala, F., Messerschmidt, R., Verdaguer, C., & Koren, C. (2005). Ecocity (Book I). Facultas Verlags-und Buchhandels AG. http://real.mtak.hu/id/eprint/13865
Ghorab, H. K., & Shalahy, H. A. (2016). Eco and green cities as new approaches for planning and developing cities in Egypt. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55, 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2015.12.018
Hajipour, M., Ekrami Moghadam, H., & Eskandari Sani, M. (2015). Green management in rural space: A case study of Dihok District, South Khorasan. Journal of Green Development Management Studies, 4(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2025.3557
Hes, D., & Bush, J. (Eds.). (2018). Enabling eco-cities: Defining, planning and creating a thriving future. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7320-5
Jiang, B. (2019). Hope for Chinese ecocities (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia). https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0388214
Joss, S. (2018). Future cities: Asserting public governance. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1–4.
Joss, S., Cowley, R., & Tomozeiu, D. (2013). Towards the “ubiquitous eco-city”: An analysis of the internationalisation of eco-city policy and practice. Urban Research & Practice, 6(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2012.762216
Jumapour, M. (2019). Environmental planning and urban and regional sustainability: Principles, methods and environmental indicators of land sustainability. Samt. https://samt.ac.ir/fa/book/1035
Kahn, M. E. (2006). Green cities: Urban growth and the environment. Potomac.
Kahn, M. E. (2008). Green cities: Urban growth and the environment. Potomac.
Kenworthy, J. R. (2006). The eco-city: Ten key transport and planning dimensions for sustainable city development. Environment and Urbanization, 18(1), 67–85.
Kibert, C. J. (2019). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247806063947
Kokhaei, T., & Masnavi, M. R. (2014). Environmental design of ecological infrastructures of urban landscape using the principle of continuity with branches (AWOP) in order to increase the quality of urban life (Reference study: Tehran city area). Journal of Environment, 40(3), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.22059/jes.2014.52205
Malekpour Asl, B., & Boustani, P. (2022). Collaborative planning approach to achieve a low-carbon city in Tehran metropolis. Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. https://doi.org/10.22034/gp.2021.46529.2856
Movahed, A., & Ghasemi, M. (2012). Spatial analysis and stratification in urban areas to achieve sustainable tourism: Case study: Ardabil city. Research on the Geography of Urban Planning, 9(4), 1125–1148. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.317702.1444
Pugh, C. (2000). Sustainable cities in developing countries (N. Moharramzade, Trans.). Center for Architectural & Urban Studies and Research. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315071404
Rahnama, M., & Abbaszadeh, G. (2008). Principles, foundations and models of the formation of the form of city. Mashhad University.
Razaghian, F., Rahnama, M. R., Tavangar, M., & Aghajani, H. (2012). Ecological analysis of urban parks (case study: Mashhad). Environment, 38(4), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.22059/jes.2013.29870
Roseland, M. (2012). Toward sustainable communities: Solutions for citizens and their governments. New Society Publishers. https://www.amazon.com/Toward-Sustainable-Communities-Fifth-Governments/dp/0865719748
Safaripour, P. (2017). Application of GIS and RS in assessing the effects of land use change on flooding in the Gol Ilam watershed using the HEC-HMS model (Master’s thesis, University of Tabriz). Ganj. https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir
Shabani, M., Alavi, S. A., Meshkini, A., & Salman Mahini, A. (2019). Spatial assessment and measurement of urban environment with a green city approach (case study: Tehran metropolis). Human Geography Research, 51(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2017.61799
Sharifi, H., Ramezanipour, M., & Ebrahimi, L. (2024). Investigating the development of urban space in the face of environmental hazards (Case study of Noor County). JGS, 24(75), 354–377. https://doi.org/10.61186/jgs.24.75.4 http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3900-fa.html
Sharifian Barforosh, S. S., & Mofidi Shemirani, S. M. (2014). Criteria for the structure of the urban ecosystem from the perspective of theorists. Bagh Nazar, 11(31), 99–108. https://sid.ir/paper/125624/fa
Tang, Z. (2011). Eco-city and green community: The evolution of planning theory and practice. Nova Science Publishers. https://novapublishers.com/shop/eco-city-and-green-community-the-evolution-of-planning-theory-and-practice/
Wang, M., Cai, L., Xu, H., & Zhao, S. (2019). Predicting land use changes in northern China using logistic regression, cellular automata, and a Markov model. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12(24), Article 790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4985-9
White, R. (2002). Building the ecological city. Woodhead Publishing. https://books.google.com/books/about/Building_the_Ecological_City.html?id=FzPKs9Rnx2QC
Wong, T. C., & Yuen, B. (2011). Eco-city planning: Policies, practice and design. Springer Science + Business Media BV. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0383-4
Yang, Z. (2012). Ecological city: Concepts, principles and practice. Urban Development Studies, 19(3), 1–8.
Yeang, K. (2009). Eco master planning. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/EcoMasterplanning-p-9780470697290
Zanganeh, A. H., Sara, & Karami, T. (2014). Spatial analysis of changes in green infrastructure in Zanjan city. Journal of Green Development Management Studies, 4(3), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2025.8558.1226
Zhou Yang, L., Xunhuan, L., & Y. (2020). Land use change and driving factors in rural China during the period 1995–2015. Land Use Policy, 99, Article 105048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105048
Volume 5, Issue 2 - Serial Number 12
Spring 2026
Pages 287-310

  • Receive Date 22 November 2025
  • Revise Date 05 February 2026
  • Accept Date 25 April 2026