Civic Literacy and Ecological Governance: A Causal Analysis with a Focus on Environmental Participation in the City of Birjand

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Over the past century, urban planning and management have faced the fundamental challenge of achieving a balance between physical development, improvement of quality of life, and environmental protection. Rapid urbanization, increasing pressure on natural resources, and the intensification of environmental crises have made the need to reconsider traditional models of urban management more evident than ever. In this context, the concept of urban ecological governance has emerged as a novel approach to sustainable city management, aiming to create synergy among governing institutions, local communities, and the natural environment in order to mitigate environmental degradation and enhance urban livability. Urban ecological governance goes beyond top-down policy-making and emphasizes informed citizen participation, institutional transparency, accountability, and environmental justice. The realization of this governance model is not feasible without citizens possessing an adequate level of civic literacy. Civic literacy, understood as a combination of knowledge, attitudes, and skills related to urban rights, social responsibilities, and environmental awareness, plays a pivotal role in shaping sustainable behaviors and enabling meaningful participation in urban affairs. In medium-sized Iranian cities such as Birjand, unbalanced physical growth, the expansion of informal settlements, and climatic constraints have contributed to a decline in ecological resilience. Due to its location in a dry and fragile climatic zone, Birjand is more vulnerable than many other cities to the consequences of inadequate natural resource management. Under such conditions, the gap between urban environmental policies and citizens’ cultural practices and behaviors has become one of the main obstacles to achieving sustainable urban development. Previous studies in Iran have largely focused on physical and managerial indicators of urban governance, while the cognitive and cultural dimensions—particularly the role of civic literacy in ecological governance—have received limited attention. Accordingly, the present study aims to examine the impact of civic literacy on urban ecological governance indicators in Birjand. The central research question seeks to determine the extent to which enhancing citizens’ knowledge and awareness can improve the quality of urban environmental governance.
 
Methodology
This study is applied in purpose and adopts a quantitative approach with a descriptive–analytical design. The research methodology is survey-based, and data were collected using a standardized questionnaire. The statistical population consists of all residents within the official urban boundaries of Birjand, with a population exceeding 200,000 according to the most recent census. Using Cochran’s formula and a 95% confidence level, a sample size of 384 respondents was determined. Sampling was conducted through stratified random sampling across different urban zones (central, northern, southern, eastern, and western areas) to ensure adequate representation of the entire population. The questionnaire comprised two main sections. The first section measured civic literacy across three dimensions: environmental awareness, urban rights, and civic participation. The second section assessed indicators of urban ecological governance, including participation, institutional accountability, managerial efficiency, and environmental justice. Data analysis was performed using SPSS and AMOS software packages. Initially, the reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Subsequently, sample adequacy and variable intercorrelations were assessed through the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure and Bartlett’s test of sphericity. To examine causal relationships among variables, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Pearson correlation analysis, linear regression, and structural equation modeling (SEM) were employed. This methodological combination enabled a robust evaluation of both the theoretical framework and the empirical model of the study.
 
Findings
Descriptive statistical results indicated that the demographic composition of the sample was sufficiently diverse. Of the respondents, 52% were female and 48% were male, with an average age of approximately 35.8 years. In terms of educational attainment, the majority of participants held a bachelor’s degree or postgraduate qualifications, a factor that significantly influenced the level of environmental awareness within the sample. The results of Cronbach’s alpha analysis demonstrated that all research variables exhibited high reliability coefficients (above 0.8), indicating strong internal consistency of the measurement instrument. The KMO value of 0.876 confirmed the adequacy of the sample for factor analysis, while the significant Bartlett’s test results indicated suitable correlations among the variables. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a strong and positive relationship between civic literacy and urban ecological governance (r = 0.692). Independent samples t-test results showed a statistically significant difference between women and men in terms of civic literacy, with women demonstrating higher levels. Furthermore, one-way ANOVA results indicated a significant effect of educational level on civic literacy. Linear regression analysis showed that civic literacy explains approximately 48% of the variance in urban ecological governance. The results of confirmatory factor analysis and model fit indices (CFI, GFI, and RMSEA) demonstrated a satisfactory fit between the theoretical model and the empirical data. Finally, the structural equation modeling results indicated that civic literacy has both direct and indirect effects—mediated through increased environmental participation—on the improvement of urban ecological governance.
 
Discussion and Conclusion
The findings of this study confirm that civic literacy constitutes a fundamental pillar of urban ecological governance. The results are consistent with international research, demonstrating that cities with higher levels of citizen awareness and participation perform more effectively in sustainable resource management and in reducing environmental conflicts. In Birjand, climatic constraints and limited natural resources necessitate a shift in urban management from a purely technical approach toward greater emphasis on social and cultural empowerment of citizens. By enhancing institutional trust and social participation, civic literacy helps bridge the gap between policy formulation and implementation, thereby fostering more responsive and effective governance. The significant differences in civic literacy based on gender and educational level highlight the role of formal and informal education in shaping ecological behaviors. These findings suggest that targeted educational policies can serve as effective instruments for improving the quality of urban governance. Overall, the results indicate that enhancing civic literacy plays a crucial role in strengthening urban ecological governance. Informed and responsible citizens not only contribute to reducing resource consumption and protecting the environment but also act as active partners in urban management, thereby improving the quality of decision-making processes. Accordingly, it is recommended that urban management authorities in Birjand invest in environmental education programs, strengthen neighborhood-based participation, and improve institutional communication channels to facilitate the realization of urban ecological governance. Ultimately, sustainable urban development cannot be achieved without attention to citizens’ cognitive and cultural capital, and civic literacy should be regarded as a key strategy in urban policy-making in Iran.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Amini, M., Saremi, H., & Ghalibaf, M. (2018). The role of urban governance in the urban worn texture regeneration process (Case study: district 12 of Tehran). Journal Of Geographical Research, 33(3), 202-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/geores.33.3.202 [In Persian].
 Askarizadeh Ardestani, S., Zarabi, A., & Taghvaei, M. (2018). Examining the status of good urban governance indicators in arak city. Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 16(1), 309-335. https://doi.org/10.22067/geography.v16i1.74544 ]In Persian].
Awad, J., & Jung, C. (2022). Extracting the planning elements for sustainable urban regeneration in Dubai with AHP (analytic hierarchy process). Sustainable Cities and Society, 76(2), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103496
Bahraini, H., Izadi, M. S., & Mofidi, M. (2014). The approaches and policies of urban renewal from urban reconstruction to sustainable urban regeneration. Motaleate Shahri, 3(9), 17-30. https://urbstudies.uok.ac.ir/article_7883.html [In Persian].
Baratta, A. F. L., Calcagnini, L., Finucci, F., & Magarò, A. (2023). Innovative housing policy tools: impact indicators in the NRRP Urban Regeneration Programmes. VITRUVIO-International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability, 8(1), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2023.19476
Biswas, R., Jana, A., Arya, K., & Ramamritham, K. (2019). A good-governance framework for urban management. Journal of Urban Management, 8(2), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.12.009
Boex, J., Malik, A. A., Brookins, D., Edwards, B., & Zaidi, H. (2020). The political economy of urban governance in Asian cities: delivering water, sanitation and solid waste management services. New Urban Agenda in Asia-Pacific: Governance for Sustainable and Inclusive Cities, 23(2), 301-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6709-0_11
Burris, S., & Lin, V. (2021). Law and urban governance for health in times of rapid change. Health Promotion International, 36(Supplement_1), i4-i12. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab064
Castán Broto, V., & Westman, L. K. (2020). Ten years after Copenhagen: Reimagining climate change governance in urban areas. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 11(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.643
Certomà, C. (2022). Future scenarios of Digital Social Innovation in urban governance. A collective discussion on the socio-political implications in Ghent. Cities, 122(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103542
Chan, H. H., Hu, T. S., & Fan, P. (2019). Social sustainability of urban regeneration led by industrial land redevelopment in Taiwan. European planning studies, 27(7), 1245-1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1577803
Coffey, B., Bush, J., Mumaw, L., De Kleyn, L., Furlong, C., & Cretney, R. (2020). Towards good governance of urban greening: insights from four initiatives in Melbourne, Australia. Australian Geographer, 51(2), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2019.1708552
 Ebrahimi, J., & Charehjoo, F. (In-Press). Investigating the role of good urban governance in regeneration of urban worn-out textures (Case study: Kamiyaran city). Human Geography Research. 0.22059/JHGR.2022.335894.1008427 [In Persian].
Ghaed Rahmati, S., Zangisheh Yei, S., & Nouri, S. (2016). Good urban governance and sustainable regeneration of the disordered context (Kermanshah city). The First International Conference and The Eighth National Conference on Urban Planning and Management, Mashhad. https://civilica.com/doc/646722 ]In Persian].
Ghasemi, H., Miri, G. R., & Hafez Rezazadeh, M. (2020). Analysis of the role of good urban governance in the regeneration of worn-out urban fabric based on foundational data theory (Case study: Shahreza). Geographical Studies of Mountainous Regions, 2(4), 37-56. http://dx.doi.org/Doi:10.52547/gsma.2.4.37 ]In Persian].
Gilmour, D., & Simpson, E. (2021). Urban regeneration indicators: A proxy for assessing common good. Emerald Open Research, 3(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/EOR-05-2023-0009
Golpaygani, N., Miri, G., & Anvari M. (2021). Analysis of the physical condition of informal settlements with emphasis on urban management (Case study: Jafarabad town Kermanshah). Geographical Studies of Mountainous Regions, 2(2), 125-144. http://dx.doi.org/Doi:10.52547/gsma.2.2.117 ]In Persian].
Hardi, R., & Gohwong, S. (2020). E-government based urban governance on the smart city program in makassar, Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy, 1(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v1i1.10
Idczak, P., & Musiałkowska, I. (2021). Urban Regeneration as a Specific Type of Public Policy Response to Urban Decline. The Case of Poland. Open Political Science, 4(1), 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2021-0019
Iran Statistics Center (2015). Population and housing census 2015. Iran Statistics Center. https://www.amar.org.ir [In Persian].
Kaufmann, W., & Lafarre, A. (2021). Does good governance mean better corporate social performance? A comparative study of OECD countries. International Public Management Journal, 24(6), 762-791. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1814916
Kim, G., Newman, G., & Jiang, B. (2020). Urban regeneration: Community engagement process for vacant land in declining cities. Cities, 102(1), 1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102730
Koozehgar, L., Adinehvand, A., Alian, M., & Nazari, N. (2017). Assessment of ahvaz urban management in the context of good governance, an effort to achieve sustainable management. Journal Of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design, 4(2), 1-16. https://jsaud.sru.ac.ir/article_662.html ]In Persian].
Korkmaz, C., & Balaban, O. (2020). Sustainability of urban regeneration in Turkey: Assessing the performance of the North Ankara Urban Regeneration Project. Habitat International, 95(2), 26-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102081
Kuo, N. L., Chen, T. Y., & Su, T. T. (2020). A new tool for urban governance or just rhetoric? The case of participatory budgeting in Taipei City. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 55(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.110
Lak, A., Gheitasi, M., & Timothy, D. J. (2020). Urban regeneration through heritage tourism: Cultural policies and strategic management. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 18(4), 386-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2019.1668002 ‌
Li, B., Yang, K., Axenov, K. E., Zhou, L., & Liu, H. (2022). Trade-Offs, Adaptation and Adaptive Governance of Urban Regeneration in Guangzhou, China (2009–2019). Land, 12(1), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010139
Li, X., Zhang, F., Hui, E. C. M., & Lang, W. (2020). Collaborative workshop and community participation: A new approach to urban regeneration in China. Cities, 102(2), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102743
Liu, G., Fu, X., Han, Q., Huang, R., & Zhuang, T. (2021). Research on the collaborative governance of urban regeneration based on a Bayesian network: The case of Chongqing. Land Use Policy, 109(1), 42-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105640
Mecca, B., & Lami, I. M. (2020). The appraisal challenge in cultural urban regeneration: An evaluation proposal. Abandoned Buildings in Contemporary Cities: Smart Conditions for Actions, 23(2), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35550-0_5
Meyer, N., & Auriacombe, C. (2019). Good urban governance and city resilience: An afrocentric approach to sustainable development. Sustainability, 11(19), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195514
Mohed, A., Kaman Roudi, M., Sasanpour, F., & Ghasemi Kafroodi, F. (2014). Investigating good urban governance in urban neighborhoods (Study case: District 19 of Tehran municipality). Quarterly Journal of Urban Planning Studies, 2(7), 147-176. https://shahr.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_1012.html [In Persian].
Peverini, M. (2021). Grounding urban governance on housing affordability: a conceptual framework for policy analysis. Insights from Vienna. Partecipazione e conflitto, 14(2), 848-869. http://dx.doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v14i2p848
Qiao, Z., Liu, L., Qin, Y., Xu, X., Wang, B., & Liu, Z. (2020). The impact of urban renewal on land surface temperature changes: A case study in the main city of Guangzhou, China. Remote Sensing, 12(5), 794-812. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050794
Ruá, M. J., Huedo, P., Civera, V., & Agost-Felip, R. (2019). A simplified model to assess vulnerable areas for urban regeneration. Sustainable Cities and Society, 46, 101440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101440
Salmah, A. U. (2020). The impact of effectiveness and participation in good governance on the quality of healthy urban planning in Makassar City, Indonesia. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences, 14, 6207-6211.
Sarwar, H., Emrai, M., Ghorbani Sepehr, A., & Amini Badamiar, Sh. (2018). Decent governance and regeneration of dilapidated urban tissues (Case study: 4th neighborhood of Azarshahr city). Development of Peri-Urban Spaces, 1(2), 71-84. https://www.jpusd.ir/article_114011.html ]In Persian].
Seo, U. S. (2020). Urban regeneration governance, community organizing, and artists’ commitment: A case study of Seongbuk-dong in Seoul. City, Culture and Society, 21(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2019.100328
Shahriari, M. R. (1400). Measuring the indicators of urban regeneration and its effect on the quality of life of citizens (Case study: Sharif Abad neighborhood). Journal Of Geography and Human Relations, 4(2), 336-356. https://www.gahr.ir/article_139944.html [In Persian].
Sharma, P. (2020). Opportunities and struggles of decentralized governance reform for urban municipalities in India. World Development Perspectives, 17(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100174
Tasan-Kok, T., van den Hurk, M., Özogul, S., & Bittencourt, S. (2019). Changing public accountability mechanisms in the governance of Dutch urban regeneration. European Planning Studies, 27(6), 1107-1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1598017
Tavaklinia, J., & Yadalenia, H. (2017). Analysis of good governance indicators in urban regeneration from the perspective of neighborhood residents (Case study: Tajrish neighborhood). Journal Of Geography (Regional Planning), 8(33), 265-280. https://www.jgeoqeshm.ir/article_83875.html ]In Persian].
Wang, H., Zhao, Y., Gao, X., & Gao, B. (2021). Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Land Use Policy, 107(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105479
Xie, F., Liu, G., & Zhuang, T. (2021). A comprehensive review of urban regeneration governance for developing appropriate governance arrangements. Land, 10(5), 545-561. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050545
Zhang, W., Zhang, X., & Wu, G. (2021). The network governance of urban renewal: A comparative analysis of two cities in China. Land Use Policy, 106(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105448