A Conceptual Framework for the Antecedents of Green Competitive Advantage in the Digital Age

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc.Student of Business management,Faculty of Humanities Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Marketing and Business, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran

3 M.Sc. of Business management,Faculty of Management,Maulana Instiute of Higher Education,Abik, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
In the contemporary global economy, rising environmental awareness, the proliferation of the green economy, and the intensification of trade barriers have compelled commercial firms—the primary drivers of the market economy—to proactively address the fundamental challenges of establishing “green competitive advantage.” Organizations are increasingly pressured to align their operations with both volatile market demands and evolving societal expectations. Concurrently, the rapid evolution of big data, digital transformation, and green innovation has fundamentally reshaped production activities, emerging as critical determinants of competitive positioning. As global markets undergo a dual transformation—both digital and environmental—the convergence of these two paradigms has garnered significant attention from both corporate stakeholders and policymakers. Achieving green competitive advantage, whether through digital integration or other strategic initiatives, is contingent upon the cultivation of a firm’s internal “green capabilities.” Grounded in dynamic capabilities theory, this perspective posits that without robust green capabilities, a firm cannot attain a sustainable level of green competitive advantage. While business digitalization and environmental sustainability have garnered scholarly attention, most existing research treats these domains in isolation, rarely exploring their integration. Furthermore, as both “digital transformation” and “green competitive advantage” remain emerging concepts, firms must cultivate the organizational flexibility required to synthesize green and digital mandates. Current literature, however, remains nascent, with many studies prioritizing digital transformation while neglecting its critical intersection with environmental sustainability. Given these gaps and the lack of clarity regarding the mechanisms linking digital transformation to competitive advantage, this study proposes a comprehensive conceptual framework. This framework aims to elucidate how digital transformation drives green competitive advantage, incorporating the moderating influence of regulatory frameworks. Additionally, by integrating mediating factors such as green capabilities, organizational flexibility, and R&D performance, this study offers a nuanced model with depth and theoretical rigor. Ultimately, these findings are expected to clarify the precise mechanisms through which digital transformation translates into green competitive advantage for modern enterprises.
 
Methodology
This study is applied in purpose and was conducted using a descriptive survey design. The statistical population comprised senior and middle managers of Kaleh Company (N = 125). Based on Cochran’s formula, a sample of 95 respondents was determined. Participants were selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using an adapted questionnaire derived from previously validated instruments. The questionnaire consisted of eight dimensions encompassing 32 items. To test the research hypotheses and analyze the data, inferential statistical methods were employed, specifically Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Data analysis was conducted using SPSS and SmartPLS software.
 
Findings
The findings of the present study indicate that digital transformation has a positive and significant effect on green innovation capabilities. This result suggests that greater integration of digital technologies and data‑driven solutions into organizational processes enhances firms’ ability to develop and implement environmentally sustainable innovations. Furthermore, the results reveal that laws and regulations moderate this relationship, indicating that regulatory and policy frameworks can shape both the strength and direction of the impact of digital transformation on green innovation capabilities. In addition, green innovation capabilities were found to have a positive and significant effect on R&D performance, implying that strengthening these capabilities improves the quality and effectiveness of research and development activities. The findings also demonstrate that R&D performance significantly enhances technological, structural, and cultural flexibility. In other words, organizations with stronger R&D performance exhibit a greater capacity to adapt to technological changes, restructure organizational arrangements, and embrace cultural change. Finally, the study confirms that all three dimensions of flexibility—technological, structural, and cultural—have a positive and significant influence on the achievement of green competitive advantage. Thus, organizations characterized by higher levels of flexibility are better positioned to sustain and strengthen their competitive position in the marketplace while simultaneously pursuing sustainability-oriented objectives.
 
Discussion and Conclusion
Based on the results of the path coefficient and t‑value analyses, all research hypotheses were supported. The findings indicate that digital transformation has a positive and significant effect on green innovation capabilities. Moreover, laws and regulations were found to moderate the relationship between digital transformation and green innovation capabilities. The results further demonstrate that green innovation capabilities exert a positive and significant influence on R&D performance. In turn, R&D performance has a positive and significant effect on technological flexibility, structural flexibility, and cultural flexibility. Additionally, each of these three dimensions of flexibility—technological, structural, and cultural—was found to have a positive and significant impact on green competitive advantage. The results also show that the GOF value exceeds the acceptable threshold of 0.30, indicating a satisfactory overall model fit. Overall, the findings suggest that digital transformation—beyond its broader impacts on the business environment—can facilitate the attainment of green competitive advantage for firms. This study contributes to the literature by integrating the concepts of green transformation and digital transformation to propose a conceptual framework explaining how digital transformation provides the necessary foundation for firms to achieve green competitive advantage through the development of green innovation capabilities and the enhancement of R&D performance. Furthermore, the proposed model highlights that the effects of digital transformation on a firm’s green innovation capabilities are shaped by the surrounding legal and regulatory environment.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Aghion, P., Bergeaud, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2023). The impact of regulation on innovation. American Economic Review, 113(11), 2894–2936. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20210107
Anning-Dorson, T. (2021). Organizational culture and leadership as antecedents to organizational flexibility: Implications for SME competitiveness. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(5), 1309–1325. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-08-2020-0288
Block, J., Lambrecht, D., Willeke, T., Cucculelli, M., & Meloni, D. (2025). Green patents and green trademarks as indicators of green innovation. Research Policy, 54(1), 105138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105138
Chigbu, B. I., & Umejesi, I. (2025). Green innovation on sustainable competitive advantage in manufacturing industries in developing countries. In Examining Green Human Resources Management and Nascent Entrepreneurship (pp. 79–114). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7046-9.ch004
Dadabaeva, R. A., & Jamoliddinov, F. S. (2024). Digital marketing as an element of sustainable development: Trends, challenges and opportunities. Цифровые модели и решения, 3(1), 65–79.
Danesh Shakib, M., & Pishdar, M. (2025). Conceptualizing the challenges of transition toward a digital circular economy with emphasis on Internet of Things technology in Industry 4.0. Green Development Management Studies, 4(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2024.7493.1116 (in Persian)
Daryaei, M. H. K., Behboodi, O., & Moradi, M. (2023). The impact of environmental innovations on sustainable business performance: The moderating role of market turbulence; A case study of Korek Company in Erbil, Iraq. Green Development Management Studies, 2(2), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2024.7088.1053 (in Persian)
Dash, B., Sharma, P., & Swayamsiddha, S. (2023). Organizational digital transformations and the importance of assessing theoretical frameworks such as TAM, TTF, and UTAUT: A review. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(2).
Davoudi, S. M. R., Abedian, M., & Kazemi, N. (2025). The relationship between green finance and green innovation in corporate risk-taking with a game theory approach. Green Development Management Studies, 4(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2024.7312.1085 (in Persian)
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021). Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820
Feng, H., Wang, F., Song, G., & Liu, L. (2022). Digital transformation on enterprise green innovation: Effect and transmission mechanism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710614
Georgewill, I. A. (2021). Structural flexibility and corporate responsiveness in the business environment: A theoretical review. European Journal of Economic and Financial Research, 4(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejefr.v4i4.1033
Groenewald, C. A., Groenewald, E., Uy, F., Kilag, O. K., Rabillas, A., & Cabuenas, M. H. (2024). Organizational agility: The role of information technology and contextual moderators—a systematic review. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(3), 32–38.
Guimarães, J. D. S., Fernandes, C., Veiga, P. M., & Ramadani, V. (2025). The relationship between entrepreneurial ecosystems and digital transformation. FIIB Business Review, 14(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145231173850
Gürlek, M., & Koseoglu, M. A. (2021). Green innovation research in the field of hospitality and tourism: The construct, antecedents, consequences, and future outlook. The Service Industries Journal, 41(11–12), 734–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2021.1929930
Li, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Zhou, Y., & Wang, C. (2025). Digital platform capability and innovation ambidexterity: The mediating role of strategic flexibility. Journal of Business Research, 186, 114971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114971
Liu, Y., Huang, H., Mbanyele, W., Wei, Z., & Li, X. (2025). How does green industrial policy affect corporate green innovation? Evidence from the green factory identification in China. Energy Economics, 141, 108047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108047
Maleki Vir, M., Fattahi, M., & Uosefi Saeidabadi, R. (2024). Developing a green digital marketing model in the business-to-business sector. Green Development Management Studies, 3(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2024.7406.1102 (in Persian)
Meier, A., Eller, R., & Peters, M. (2025). Creating competitiveness in incumbent small‑ and medium‑sized enterprises: A revised perspective on digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, 186, 115028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115028
Men, F., Dong, F., Liu, Y., & Yang, H. (2023). Research on the impact of digital transformation on the product R&D performance of automobile enterprises from the perspective of the innovation ecosystem. Sustainability, 15(7), 6265. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076265
Naim, A., Khan, S. A., Mohammed, A. B., & Malik, P. K. (2024). Applications of high performance computing and AI in green digital marketing. In AI Applications for Business, Medical, and Agricultural Sustainability (pp. 47–67). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5266-3.ch003
Pourbagher, M., & Aghasi, S. (2025). Designing a green digital identity model based on the development of technological innovation. Green Development Management Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2025.8345.1212
Ramos, E., Patrucco, A. S., & Chavez, M. (2023). Dynamic capabilities in the “new normal”: A study of organizational flexibility, integration and agility in the Peruvian coffee supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 28(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2020-0620
Salehnia, M. (2024). Supportive green subsidy policy in the agricultural sector: Global experiences for managers and policymakers. Green Development Management Studies, 3(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2024.7300.1088 (in Persian)
Sharma, M., Luthra, S., Joshi, S., Kumar, A., & Jain, A. (2023). Green logistics driven circular practices adoption in Industry 4.0 era: A moderating effect of institution pressure and supply chain flexibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 383, 135284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135284
Takalo, S. K., & Tooranloo, H. S. (2021). Green innovation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 122474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122474
Tang, M., Liu, Y., Hu, F., & Wu, B. (2023). Effect of digital transformation on enterprises’ green innovation: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Energy Economics, 128, 107135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107135
Tong, T., Iqbal, K., & Rahman, A. A. (2022). Core technological competence and competitive advantage: A study on Chinese high‑tech SMEs. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 959448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.959448
Wu, K., & Lu, Y. (2023). Corporate digital transformation and financialization: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Finance Research Letters, 57, 104229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104229
Wu, S., Cheng, P., & Yang, F. (2024). Study on the impact of digital transformation on green competitive advantage: The role of green innovation and government regulation. PLOS ONE, 19(8), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306603
Xu, C., Sun, G., & Kong, T. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on enterprise green innovation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 90, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.11.001
Yang, Y., Ren, H., Liu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2025). Integration of technology and finance, digital transformation and corporate green innovation. Finance Research Letters, 71, 106444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106444
Zhao, G., Zhang, J., & Chen, W. (2025). Environmental regulation policy and enterprise digital transformation: Evidence from low‑carbon city policies in China. International Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-03-2024-0526