Examining the Mediating Role of Brand Attitude in the Relationship Between Green Packaging and Bulk Products on Willingness to Pay

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant professor, Department of Business Management, Payame Noor university, Tehran, Iran

2 Phd Candidate, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Social sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Today, consumers are increasingly environmentally conscious and committed to adopting healthy lifestyles. Since they consider packaging as a source of waste, they prefer to buy more environmentally friendly packaged goods or, if available, purchase unpackaged goods. Consumers often find environmentally friendly packaging to be too expensive. Understanding consumers’ attitudes towards sustainability is essential in order to assess their willingness to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Companies may encourage consumers to exhibit environmentally friendly behaviors by offering recyclable or biodegradable packaging or by eliminating excess packaging. As a result, companies are improving their environmental offerings by selling sustainably packaged products or bulk products. Health concerns are a powerful driver of pro-environmental purchasing behavior. The most effective way to promote environmentally friendly packaging is to set packaging standards and regulations, and enterprises adopt greening for various reasons such as compliance with laws, gaining competitive advantage, shareholder pressure, and top management initiatives. While assuming social responsibilities and facing fierce competition, companies are gradually realizing the importance of creating a green image to highlight their environmental awareness and social responsibility. Dairy product packaging using plastic constitutes the main consumer waste due to its relatively low recycling rate. This has prompted environmental researchers to explore the discussion on how to reduce packaging waste by studying the behavior of dairy consumers. For consumers, packaging and environmental friendliness are two complex environmental issues. This study compares two packaging practices (i.e., sustainable packaging products and bulk products). The aim of this study is to investigate the difference between green and bulk packaging practices in willingness to pay for the product with the mediating role of attitude towards the brand.
 
Methodology
The present study is of correlational type and according to the purpose of the study, it is of applied type and the data collection was done in the field. The statistical population of this study was the consumers of dairy products in Tehran province, who completed 384 questionnaires using the Cochran formula using the available sampling method. In this context, the general framework of questions of the Green Packaging and Bulk Products Questionnaire by E. Di Canio (2023), Brand Attitude by Crystallis and Christo (2013), and Akbari's research (2014) were used, which were provided to the research participants, and the validity and reliability of these questionnaires had been confirmed in previous research.
 
Findings
According to the findings, the path coefficients from green packaging and bulk products to willingness to pay for the product indicate that different green packaging methods and bulk products affect the willingness to pay for the product. Also, according to the path coefficients from green packaging and bulk products to brand attitude, it is concluded that different green packaging methods and bulk products affect brand attitude and are significant at the 0.05 error level. From brand attitude to willingness to pay for the product, it is concluded that brand attitude affects willingness to pay for the product. Based on the results of composite reliability, extracted variance, model determination coefficient and goodness of fit index, we concluded that the model presented in the field of path analysis has appropriate empirical-theoretical assumptions and has a very good fit. Therefore, the main hypothesis of the study, namely, green and bulk packaging methods affect willingness to pay through the mediation of brand attitude, is confirmed.
 
Discussion and Conclusion
According to the results of this study, bulk products had a greater impact on the willingness to pay for the product compared to green packaging. The results of this hypothesis are consistent with the results of the study by Ghanji et al. (2022), Dariy et al. (2021), and Mahmoud et al. (2022). According to the findings of the study, an important point that we have reached is that although the effect of bulk products on the willingness to pay for the product is greater, despite the effect that green packaging has on brand attitude, the overall effects of green packaging on the willingness to pay for the product are greater through the mediation of brand attitude. Green and bulk packaging methods have an effect on the willingness to pay through the mediation of brand attitude. These results are similar to the results of the study by Dariy et al. (2021), Di Canio et al. (2023), Mahmoud et al. (2022), and Vahid et al. (2018). Green packaging had a greater impact on brand attitude compared to bulk products, meaning that people in the community like products that are environmentally friendly due to environmental concerns. In the present study, most dairy consumers were environmentally conscious and had a certain willingness to pay for green products. It was believed that green packaging has a great impact on improving the environmental environment, and its purchase and use can lead to better social recognition. Dairy companies should try to improve the use of recyclable materials in the production process, the level of information about environmental management for consumers. Factors that influenced consumers' willingness to pay for green packaging were; reusability, ease of use, social support, and advertising. It is suggested that the government and non-profit social organizations should make more efforts to promote environmental protection. On the one hand, social media and the Internet, along with social speeches and advertising, should cooperate to publicize knowledge about green packaging and improve consumers' recognition of green packaging. The government should consider more incentives for dairy companies that use green packaging in the production process, so that these companies can use recyclable and biodegradable raw materials in dairy packaging to enable recycling and reuse.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Andrade, M. S., Ishikawa, O. H., Costa, R. S., Seixas, M. V., Rodrigues, R. C., & Moura, E. A. (2022). Development of sustainable food packaging material based on biodegradable polymer reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 31, 100807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100807
Beitzen-Heineke, E. F., Balta-Ozkan, N., & Reefke, H. (2017). The prospects of zero-packaging grocery stores to improve the social and environmental impacts of the food supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1528-1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.227
Chang, C. T., & Hung, M. F. (2023). Mind the gap: Analyzing factors associated with consumers' single-use product reduction. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 36, 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.12.019 
Chen, Y. S. (2008). The driver of green innovation and green image–green core competence. Journal of business ethics, 81, 531-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9522-1
Chen, Y. S., & Chang, K. C. (2013). The nonlinear effect of green innovation on the corporate competitive advantage. Quality & Quantity, 47, 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9518-x
Daraei, A., Akbari, M., & Mousavi Kashi, Z. (2021). The Relationship between Green Packaging and Green Brand Attachment with the Mediating Roles of Green Trust, Green Brand Attitude, and Green Brand Image. New Marketing Research Journal, 11(3), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.22108/nmrj.2021.124655.2218  [in persian]
D'Attoma, I., & Ieva, M. (2022). The role of marketing strategies in achieving the environmental benefits of innovation.  Journal of Cleaner Production342, 130957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130957
De Canio, F. (2023). Consumer willingness to pay more for pro-environmental packages: The moderating role of familiarity. Journal of Environmental Management339, 117828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117828
De Canio, F., Martinelli, E., & Endrighi, E. (2021). Enhancing consumers' pro-environmental purchase intentions: the moderating role of environmental concern. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(9), 1312-1329. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2020-0301
De Canio, F., Viglia, G., & Lombart, C. (2024). Package-free products: How to improve pro-environmental buying behaviors among consumers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 122995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122995 
Dursun, I., Kabadayi, E. T., Koksal, C. G., & Tuger, A. T. (2016). Pro-environmental consumption: Is it really all about the environment?. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics3(2), 114-134. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016219940
European Commission, European Green Deal: putting an end to wasteful packaging, boosting reuse and recycling. (2022). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/pressco rner/detail/en/ip_22_7155
Fortune. (2021). Green Packaging Market Size, Share & Covid-19 Impact Analysis. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/green-packaging-market-105113
Fuentes, C., Enarsson, P., & Kristoffersson, L. (2019). Unpacking package free shopping: Alternative retailing and the reinvention of the practice of shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.016
Gardas, B. B., Raut, R. D., & Narkhede, B. (2019). Identifying critical success factors to facilitate reusable plastic packaging towards sustainable supply chain management. Journal of environmental management236, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.113
German, J. D., Redi, A. A. N. P., Prasetyo, Y. T., Persada, S. F., Ong, A. K. S., Young, M. N., & Nadlifatin, R. (2022). Choosing a package carrier during COVID-19 pandemic: An integration of pro-environmental planned behavior (PEPB) theory and Service Quality (SERVQUAL). Journal of cleaner production, 346, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11382
Ghanji, M., Khoshnodi Far, Z., Gudarzi, G. (2022). Analysis of the effective components of packaging on the willingness to buy food products, Packaging science and techniques, 13(51).13-20. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22286675.1401.13.51.2.5  [in persian]
Ghasemzadeh Sangroudi, M., Hamdi, K., & Vahabzadeh Munshi, Sh. (2024) A conceptual framework of the impact of green packaging on brand attachment. Green Development Management Studies, 3(2), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2024.7119.1059. [in persian]
Gordon‐Wilson, S., Modi, P., & Eastman, J. K. (2022). Values, personality traits, and packaging‐free shopping: A mixed‐method approach. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(2), 546-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12418
Grand View Research. (2022). Zero Waste Packaging Market Size. https://www.grand viewresearch.com/industry-analysis/zero-waste-packaging-market-report.
Gronman, K., Soukka, R., Jarvi‐Kaariainen, T., Katajajuuri, J. M., Kuisma, M., Koivupuro, H. K., & Linnanen, L. (2013). Framework for sustainable food packaging design. Packaging Technology and Science, 26(4), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.1971
Hao, Y., Liu, H., Chen, H., Sha, Y., Ji, H., & Fan, J. (2019). What affect consumers’ willingness to pay for green packaging? Evidence from China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.001
Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza-Ibanez, V. (2012). Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. Journal of business Research65(9), 1254-1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.11.001
Hosseini, M., (2024), Explaining the greening of industrial marketing mix from the perspective of behavioral theories (case study of Tehran Oil Company) , Green Development Management Studies, 2 (2), 4. Autumn & Winter February 2024. P, 169-185. https://dio:org.ir/10.22077/JGDMS.2024.7117.1061. [In Persian]
Jaberi, M. , hamdi, K. and Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F. (2025). Presenting the conceptual framework of in-store factors affecting green consumption behavior. Green Development Management Studies, () , -. https://doi:org.ir/10.22077/jgdms.2024.7805.1160. [in persian]
Khan, M. M., Waheed, S., & Ahmad, N. (2018). Product Packaging and Consumer Purchase Intentions. Market Forces College of Management Sciences, 13, 97-114. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329736165_Product_Packaging_and_Consumer_Purchase_Intentions
Kushwaha, G. S., & Sharma, N. K. (2016). Green initiatives: a step towards sustainable development and firm's performance in the automobile industry. Journal of cleaner production, 121, 116-129. https://doi:org.ir/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.072
Liu, F., Li, J., Mizerski, D., & Soh, H. (2012). Self‐congruity, brand attitude, and brand loyalty: a study on luxury brands. European Journal of Marketing, 46(7/8), 922-937. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211230098
Magnier, L., & Schoormans, J. (2015). Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology44, 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.005
Mahmoud, M. A., Tsetse, E. K. K., Tulasi, E. E., & Muddey, D. K. (2022). Green packaging, environmental awareness, willingness to pay and consumers’ purchase decisions. Sustainability14(23), 16091. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316091
Marchi, V. D., Maria, E. D., & Micelli, S. (2013). Environmental strategies, upgrading and competitive advantage in global value chains. Business strategy and the environment, 22(1), 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1738
Marken, G. H., & Horisch, J. (2019). Purchasing unpackaged food products: An empirical analysis of personal norms and contextual barriers. Nachhaltigkeits Management Forum, 27(3), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-020-00490-5
Masajo-Manalili, N., Dorado, M. A., & van Otterdijk, R. (2014). Appropriate food packaging solutions for developing countries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/i3684e
Mumbi, K. M., Karanja, N. P., & Kiarie, M. D. (2021). Green packaging, green distribution and competitive advantage in the horticultural sector in Kenya. International Journal of Social Sciences Management and Entrepreneurship (IJSSME), 4(2), 93-111.   https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:233422084
Newton, J. D., Tsarenko, Y., Ferraro, C., & Sands, S. (2015). Environmental concern and environmental purchase intentions: The mediating role of learning strategy. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 1974-1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.007
Picha, K., & Navrátil, J. (2019). The factors of Lifestyle of Health and Sustainability influencing pro-environmental buying behaviour. Journal of cleaner production, 234, 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.072
Pietzsch, N., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & de Medeiros, J. F. (2017). Benefits, challenges and critical factors of success for Zero Waste: A systematic literature review. Waste management, 67, 324-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.004
Rapp, A., Marino, A., Simeoni, R., & Cena, F. (2017). An ethnographic study of packaging-free purchasing: designing an interactive system to support sustainable social practices. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(11), 1193-1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1365170
Relentlessly, O. (2022). as Waste Management and Recycling Fall Short. Says OECD.  https://www.oecd.org/environment/plastic-pollution-isgrowing-relentlessly-as-waste-management-and-recycling-fall-short.htm.
Rokka, J., & Uusitalo, L. (2008). Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices–do consumers care?. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 516-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00710.x
Saira, G. C., & Shanthakumar, S. (2023). Zero waste discharge in tannery industries–An achievable reality? A recent review. Journal of Environmental Management335, 117508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117508
The World Bank Solid Waste Management. https://www.worldbank.org/en/to pic/urbandevelopment/brief/solid-waste-management, 2022. 
Voon, J. P., Ngui, K. S., & Agrawal, A. (2011). Determinants of willingness to purchase organic food: An exploratory study using structural equation modeling. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 14(2), 103-120.   https://ssrn.com/abstract=1875186
Walsh, P. P., Murphy, E., & Horan, D. (2020). The role of science, technology and innovation in the UN 2030 agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119957
Werther, W.B. and Chandler, D. (2011) Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Stakeholders in a Global Environment. 2nd Edition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2672710
Yadav, S., Patel, S., Killedar, D. J., Kumar, S., & Kumar, R. (2022). Eco-innovations and sustainability in solid waste management: An indian upfront in technological, organizational, start-ups and financial framework. Journal of Environmental Management302, 113953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113953
Yang, Y. C., & Zhao, X. (2019). Exploring the relationship of green packaging design with consumers' green trust, and green brand attachment. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal47(8), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8181