Analysis of Circular Supply Chain Indicators in Iran’s Electrical and Electronic Industries

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 1Department of Industrial Management, Isf.C, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Mathematics, Isf.C, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

3 Department of Management, Mo.C, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

4 Department of Management, Isf.C, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The electrical and electronic industry is among the fastest-growing sectors worldwide, generating substantial volumes of electronic waste (e-waste) and consuming significant natural resources. These trends pose serious environmental and economic challenges, underscoring the need for a transition toward a circular economy (CE) approach. A circular supply chain (CSC) seeks to minimize waste, promote material reuse, and enhance environmental sustainability by replacing the traditional linear “take–make–dispose” model with a closed-loop system. However, the effective implementation of CSCs requires the identification of key drivers, the mitigation of barriers, and an understanding of their implications for supply chain performance. Despite growing academic and practical interest in CE, its adoption in the electrical and electronic industries of developing countries, including Iran, remains limited due to technological, regulatory, and financial constraints. This study aims to analyze the causal relationships among drivers, barriers, and outcomes of circular supply chains using the Fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (Fuzzy DEMATEL) method. By examining 75 key indicators identified through an extensive literature review and expert consultation, the study seeks to determine the most influential factors affecting CE implementation in Iran’s electrical and electronic industries.
 
Methodology
This study applies the fuzzy DEMATEL technique, a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method designed to analyze complex causal relationships among interrelated variables. The research adopts a descriptive–exploratory design with a mixed qualitative–quantitative approach. Data were collected through expert surveys involving specialists from industrial and academic sectors with expertise in circular economy and supply chain management. The 75 identified indicators were classified into three main categories:
Drivers, which facilitate CE adoption (e.g., infrastructure development and managerial support);
Barriers, which hinder implementation (e.g., high investment costs and lack of standards);
Outcomes, representing the expected benefits of CE adoption (e.g., reduced material consumption and improved efficiency).
Experts assessed the degree of influence among indicators using a linguistic scale, which was subsequently converted into fuzzy triangular numbers. The fuzzy DEMATEL procedure was then employed to construct a causal relationship matrix and identify the most influential indicators within Iran’s electrical and electronic industry.
 
Findings
The results reveal that drivers exert the strongest causal influence, indicating that improvements in infrastructure, managerial commitment, and technological capability are essential for effective CE adoption. Among the most influential drivers, infrastructure development (BD3) exhibited the highest importance score (0.0394), highlighting its central role in enabling circular practices. Durable product design (CD7) (0.0151) was identified as a critical factor in extending product life cycles and reducing material waste, while performance assessment criteria (BD2) (0.0154) were found to enhance transparency and operational efficiency in CE implementation. In contrast, barriers were shown to negatively affect adoption, with technological limitations (BB2), high investment costs (CB3), and the lack of regulatory standards (BB1) emerging as the most significant obstacles. Regarding outcomes, the findings indicate that CE adoption primarily yields economic and environmental benefits. The most important outcomes include increased supply chain efficiency (O8) with an importance score of 0.0227, reduced raw material consumption (O7) (0.0174), and lower greenhouse gas emissions (O4) (0.0166). The causal analysis confirms that strengthening key drivers can effectively mitigate barriers and enhance positive CE outcomes.
 
Discussion and Conclusion
The findings underscore the pivotal role of drivers in facilitating the transition toward a circular economy in Iran’s electrical and electronic industries. Infrastructure development (BD3), managerial commitment (CD6), and durable product design (CD7) emerged as the most influential drivers, enabling efficient recycling systems, extended product life cycles, and more sustainable supply chain practices. Nevertheless, the adoption of circular supply chains remains constrained by major barriers, including technological limitations, high initial investment costs, and insufficient regulatory frameworks. The study also highlights the key outcomes associated with CE implementation, particularly enhanced supply chain efficiency, reduced consumption of raw materials, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. These outcomes demonstrate the long-term economic and environmental advantages of shifting from a linear to a circular and regenerative system. The fuzzy DEMATEL analysis confirms that drivers function as root causes, barriers act as constraining factors, and outcomes represent the ultimate benefits of CE adoption. Accordingly, a strategic emphasis on strengthening key drivers can help overcome barriers and maximize positive impacts. This research provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the causal relationships among drivers, barriers, and outcomes in circular supply chains. The results indicate that prioritizing infrastructure development, regulatory support, and technological advancement is essential for the successful implementation of CE. Addressing systemic barriers through policy reforms, financial incentives, and public–private partnerships will be critical to accelerating this transition. The study offers valuable insights for policymakers, industry practitioners, and researchers seeking to design sustainable supply chain models aligned with CE principles. By adopting a strategic and integrated approach, Iran’s electrical and electronic industry can reduce waste generation, improve resource efficiency, and contribute to global sustainability objectives.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Afrakhteh, H. (2022). Ecological Economics and the Protection of Earth's Ecosystems. Green Development Management Studies, 1(1), 1–15. DOI:10.22077/jgmd.2023.6089.1018 (In Persian)
Alizadeh, A., Seyyedi, S. H., Seyyedi, A., & Zamani, M. (2023). An analysis of environmental projects implemented in Fajr Jam Gas Refining Company. Green Management Development Studies, 3(10), 1–20. DOI: 10.22077/jgmd.2023.6102.1019 (In Persian)
Allahyari, E., Mazari-Moghadam, N. S., & Nasih, N. (2022). Green University: Resource Management Strategy and Sustainable Development at Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Green Development Management Studies, 3(10), 93–116. DOI:10.22077/jgmd.2023.6102.1019 (In Persian)
Altuntas, S., Dereli, T. (2015). A novel approach based on DEMATEL method and patent citation analysis for prioritizing a portfolio of investment projects. Expert Systems with Applications. 42(3):1003–1012. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.018
Baldé, C.P., D’Angelo, E., Luda, V., Deubzer, O, and Kuehr, R.  (2022). Global Transboundary E-waste Flows Monitor - 2022, United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR), Bonn, Germany.
Baldé, C.P., Kuehr, R., Yamamoto, T., McDonald, R., D’Angelo, E., Althaf, SH., Bel, G., Deubzer, O., Fernandez-Cubillo, E., Forti, V., Gray, V., Herat, S., Honda, SH., Iattoni, G., Khetriwal, D.S., di Cortemiglia, V.L., Lobuntsova, Y., Nnorom, I., Pralat, N., Wagner, M. (2024). International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR). Global E-waste Monitor 2024. Geneva/Bonn. DOI: 10.53333/CEWASTE2024
Bocken, N., and S. Short. (2016). Towards a Sufficiency-driven Business Model: Experiences and Opportunities. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18: 41–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.010‌
Chen, F-H., Hsu, T-S., Tzeng, G-H. (2011). balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 30: 908. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.02.001
Cooper, M. C., L. M. Ellram. (1993). Characteristics of Supply Chain Management and the Implications for Purchasing and Logistics Strategy. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 4 (2): 13–24. DOI: 10.1108/09574099310804957‌
Coughlan, D., Fitzpatrick, C. (2020). Trialling the preparation for reuse of consumer ICT WEEE in Ireland. Cleaner Production. 256, 120512. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120512
Daú, G., Scavarda, A., Scavarda, L.F., Portugal, V.J.T. (2019). The Healthcare Sustainable Supply Chain 4.0: The Circular Economy Transition Conceptual Framework with the Corporate Social Responsibility Mirror. Sustainability, 11, 3259. DOI: 10.3390/su11123259‌
De Angelis, R., Howard, M., Miemczyk, J. (2018). Supply Chain Management and the Circular Economy: Towards the Circular Supply Chain. Production Planning & Control, 29, 425–437. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2018.1449244‌
Defee, C., Stank, T. P.  (2005). Applying the Strategy-Structure-Performance Paradigm to the Supply Chain Environment. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16 (1): 28–50. DOI: 10.1108/09574090510617349‌
Di Maria, E., De Marchi, V., Galeazzo, A. (2022). Industry 4.0 technologies and circular economy: The mediating role of supply chain integration. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(2), 619-632. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2940
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2012). Towards the Circular Economy.: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Industrial Ecology, 10(1–2), 4–8.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2014). Cowes, UK Available online: http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/books-and-report.
Eskandari Sani, M., & Sofalgar, S. (2022). Integrating green and circular economy: A novel approach to sustainable income in Birjand. Green Development Management Studies, 1(2), 159–172. DOI: 10.22077/jgmd.2023.6171.1023 (In Persian)
Fehrer, J. A., & Wieland, H. (2020). A systemic logic for circular business models. Business Research, 125, 609–620. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.010‌
Forti, V., Bald´e, C.P., Kuehr, R., Bel, G., (2020). The Global E-Waste Monitor 2020: Quantities, Flows and the Circular Economy Potential. United Nations University (UNU)/United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) – co-hosted SCYCLE Programme, International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & International Solid Waste Association (ISWA), Bonn/Geneva/Rotterdam. DOI: 10.53333/CEWASTE2020
Genovese, A., Acquaye, A.A., Figueroa, A., Koh, S.L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega, 66, 344–357. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015
González-Sánchez, R., Settembre-Blundo, D., Maria Ferrari, A. E., García-Muiña, F. (2020). Main Dimensions in the Building of the Circular Supply Chain: A Literature Review. Sustainability, 12, 2459. DOI: 10.3390/su12062459
Guzzo, D., Rodrigues, V.P., Mascarenhas, J. (2020). A systems representation of the Circular Economy: Transition scenarios in the electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) industry, Technological Forecasting & Social Change. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120414.
Horbach, J., Rammer, C. (2020). Circular economy innovations, growth and employment at the firm level: Empirical evidence from Germany. Industrial Ecology, 24, 615–625. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12977‌
Hosseinpour, A., Ghorbanpour, A. (2023). Presenting a model based on the dimensions of circular economy, clean production and the fourth generation industrial revolution to improve the sustainable productivity of manufacturing industries, Quantitative Economics (Former Economic Reviews), 20(2), pp. 165-185. DOI: 10.22055/jqe.2022.39085.2433 (In Persian)
Kazancoglu, Y., Kazancoglu, I., Sagnak, M. (2018). A new holistic conceptual framework for green supply chain management performance assessment based on circular economy. Cleaner Production, 36, 82–1299. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.015
Khatami Nasab, G., Hadi Vincheh, A., Arman, M.H., Aghajani, M. (2025), Proposing a Circular Supply Chain Model in Electrical and Electronic Industries with a Grounded Theory Approach, Productivity Management, 78. (In Persian)
Kiani, M., Andalib Ardakani, D., Zare Ahmadabadi, H., Mirfakhraldini, S.H. (2024), An analysis of the effective enablers on the implementation of circular economy and industry 4.0 in the supply chain. Industrial Management Studies, 21(70). DOI: 10/22054/jims.2023.71900.2835 (In Persian)
Mahpour, A. (2018). Prioritizing barriers to adopt circular economy in construction and demolition waste management, Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 134, 216–227. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.026‌
Manoharan, Sh., Kumar Pulimi, vs., Kabir, G., Ali, SM. (2022). Contextual relationships among drivers and barriers to circular economy: An integrated ISM and DEMATEL approach. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3 43–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.susoc.2021.09.003‌
Mishra, J.L., Hopkinson, P.G., Tidridge, G. (2018). Value creation from circular economy-led closed loop supply chains: a case study of fast-moving consumer goods. Production Planning & Control, 29 (6), 509e521. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2017.1414016
Moktadir, MA., Rahman, T., Rahman, MH., Ali, SM. (2018). Drivers to sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy: A perspective of leather industries in Bangladesh. Cleaner Production, 174 -1366e1380. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.063
Murray, A., Skene, K., Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Business Ethics,140, 369–380. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3123-4
Pasqualotto, C., Callegaro-De-Menezes, D., Stephanus Lodewyk Schutte, C. (2023). An Overview and Categorization of the Drivers and Barriers to the Adoption of the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 15, 10532. DOI: 10.3390/su151310532‌
Rizos, V., Bryhn, J. (2022). Implementation of circular economy approaches in the electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) sector: Barriers, enablers and policy insights. Cleaner Production, 338 (2022) 130617. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130617
Rokna, (2022), Report on the Hidden Treasure of Electronic Waste and Iran's Lack of Attention to Its Recycling, News Code 828834, https://www.rokna.net/fa/tiny/news-828834. (In Persian)
Seuring, S., Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
Varasteh, M., Aghajani, H., Valipour Khatir, M., Aghaei, M. (2023). Extracting a framework for evaluating circular business models in the Iranian steel industry based on a circular economy approach. Productivity Management, (164(63)). 53-81. DOI: 10.22034/JPM.2022.1971193.2952 (In Persian)
Vares, S.H. Mohammadian, A., Heydari-Dehoui, J., Khajehian, D., Nabizadeh, N. (2023). A framework for classifying circular business model patterns from the perspective of circular economy strategies. Business Management, 14(1). 13-65. DOI: 10.22059/jibm.2021.319777.4072. (In Persian)
Widmer, R., Oswald-Krapf, H., Sinha-Khetriwal, D., Schnellmann, M., Böni, H. (2005). Global perspectives on e-waste. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(5). 436-458. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.04.001
Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Lai, K.H. (2010). Circular economy practices among Chinese manufacturers varying in environmental-oriented supply chain cooperation and the performance implications. Environmental Management, 91, 1324–1331. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.013