Providing a sustainable advertising model with A Meta-Synthesis Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Depatment of Management, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Prof, Depatment of Management, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
In recent decades, the proliferation of advertising messages—often exaggerated, misleading, or poorly timed—has fueled growing audience skepticism toward advertising. This erosion of trust underscores the need for a more credible and responsible approach: sustainable advertising. When companies make unsubstantiated or inconsistent sustainability claims, they risk being perceived as hypocritical, which can damage brand credibility, dilute corporate identity, and undermine reputation. Such greenwashing not only weakens consumer trust but may also trigger negative market reactions, including diminished expectations of future financial performance and declines in stock valuation. Ultimately, these perceptions suppress purchase intention, even among environmentally conscious consumers. Sustainable advertising is defined as communication that authentically promotes the social, economic, and environmental benefits of products, services, or corporate actions through media channels, with the aim of fostering responsible consumption. While consumer surveys consistently show strong pro-sustainability attitudes—65% of respondents in a recent global study expressed a preference for brands committed to sustainability—only 26% actually followed through with a purchase. Yet, over 85% of consumers worldwide report actively shifting toward sustainable products, signaling that sustainability has become a mainstream expectation in branding and advertising, and a strategic source of competitive advantage. Despite this trend, a persistent attitude–behavior gap remains poorly understood in the advertising and sustainability literature. Consumer responses to sustainability-oriented messaging vary significantly, shaped by a complex interplay of psychological, contextual, and cultural factors that have not been comprehensively examined. To address this gap, the present study proposes an integrative sustainable advertising model developed through a mixed-methods (hybrid) research approach, offering both theoretical advancement and practical guidance for ethical, effective green communication.
 
Materials and Methods
The present study is applied in purpose and adopts a qualitative, exploratory, and meta-composite research design. Specifically, it employs Meta synthesis—a qualitative method that systematically integrates findings from existing qualitative and quantitative studies to generate novel concepts, interpretations, or theoretical insights. Unlike traditional literature reviews, Meta synthesis goes beyond summarizing evidence; it reinterprets and synthesizes data across studies to construct higher-order understandings of a phenomenon. While trans combinatory (meta-composite) approaches can be implemented through various methodological frameworks, this study follows the seven-step Meta synthesis procedure proposed by Sandelowski and Barroso (2006). This structured approach enables rigorous identification, appraisal, and integration of relevant empirical findings to develop a coherent and contextually grounded model of sustainable advertising.
 
Findings
The components of the research include: what is it, what is the society, the time limit and how is the method. Based on them, the main research question was formed: What is the model of sustainable advertising? The statistical population of the research consists of all articles, theses and scientific documents in domestic and foreign journals. In the research, 6 keywords (sustainable advertising, sustainable marketing + advertising, factors affecting sustainable advertising, drivers of sustainable advertising, models of sustainable advertising, consequences of sustainable advertising) in foreign and domestic databases were searched in full from 2010 to 2024. The search result included 924 articles, books, theses and reports of institutions related to this field. To select suitable articles, different items such as: title, abstract, content, questions and research methodology have been reviewed. Finally, 65 articles were selected by carefully reviewing the texts, and after applying the critical evaluation criteria, 38 articles were selected as final articles.
 
Discussion and conclusion
The findings of the derived model are organized into three core categories: drivers, sustainable advertising, and consequences. Drivers refer to the factors that shape effective sustainable advertising. For such advertising to succeed, companies must consider four interrelated dimensions: consumer, company, market, and society. First, firms should establish a dedicated team of marketing and advertising professionals equipped with adequate financial resources, data, technological infrastructure, and managerial support. This team must deeply understand the target audience and craft messages that are truthful, free from exaggeration, and delivered through credible channels—enhancing audience trust and engagement. Messaging should also reflect societal consumption norms and their evolution. Monitoring competitors and industry trends helps refine content and better resonate with audiences. In today’s digital landscape, leveraging emerging technologies—particularly artificial intelligence—can significantly enhance message relevance and reach. Collaborating with environmental influencers and public figures further boosts credibility. Internally, company leaders should educate employees about sustainability through workshops and meetings, fostering organizational buy-in. Advertisements may also highlight the negative consequences of ignoring environmental, social, and economic sustainability to strengthen persuasive impact. Consequences encompass the outcomes of implementing sustainable advertising, categorized as impacts on consumers, companies, and society/market. For consumers, sustainable advertising increases awareness and knowledge of sustainability issues, informing more responsible purchasing decisions. Recognizing the long-term harms of environmental degradation—especially for future generations—motivates shifts toward sustainable consumption. At the societal level, when sustainable consumption becomes culturally embedded, it drives broader progress toward sustainable development, advancing economic, social, and environmental well-being.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abdelrazek, N. A., & El-Bassiouny, N. (2023). Online brand advocacy for sustainable brands: a study in an emerging market. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review, 2(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-06-2022-0029
Aggarwal, V., Yadav, P. D., Singh, V. K., & Dash, S. (2021). Sustainable behaviour and social media: a study of centennials attitudes towards sustainable advertising. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(6), 777-794. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2021.118653
Ballestar, M. T., Cuerdo-Mir, M., & Freire-Rubio, M. T. (2020). The concept of sustainability on social media: A social listening approach. Sustainability, 12(5), 2122. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052122
Beličková, P., & Kusá, A. (2023, September). Using neuromarketing to create more effective messages in sustainability advertising campaigns. In European conference on innovation and entrepreneurship, 18(1), 493-500. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecie.18.1.1673
Bhattacharyya, J. (2023). The structure of sustainability marketing research: a bibliometric review and directions for future research. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 15(2), 245-286. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-06-2021-0239
Carfora, V., & Catellani, P. (2022). Advertising Innovative Sustainable Fashion: Informational, Transformational, or Sustainability Appeal. Sustainability, 14(23), 16148. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316148
Catlin, J. R., Luchs, M. G., & Phipps, M. (2017). Consumer perceptions of the social vs. environmental dimensions of sustainability. Journal of Consumer Policy, 40, 245-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-017-9356-x
Chakraborty, S., & Sadachar, A. (2022). “Why Should I Buy Sustainable Apparel? ” Impact of User-Centric Advertisements on Consumers’ Affective Responses and Sustainable Apparel Purchase Intentions. Sustainability, 14(18), 11560. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811560
Chou, S. F., Horng, J. S., Liu, C. H., Yu, T. Y., & Kuo, Y. T. (2022). Identifying the critical factors for sustainable marketing in the catering: The influence of big data applications, marketing innovation, and technology acceptance model factors. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 51, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.02.010
Cummins, S., Reilly, T. M., Carlson, L., Grove, S. J., & Dorsch, M. J. (2014). Investigating the portrayal and influence of sustainability claims in an environmental advertising context. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(3), 332-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146713518944
Ediriweera, C., Fernando, M. T., & Pramudika, H. (2024). AI-Driven Sustainable Video Marketing Strategies: Harnessing Deep Learning Algorithms to Sustainable Advertising Campaigns with Special Reference to the Education Industry. Asian Journal of Marketing Management, 3(01). https://doi.org/10.31357/ajmm.v3i01.7304
Eyada, B. (2024). The Role of Advertising in Shaping Consumer Perceptions of Sustainable Brands. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(3), 930-943. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i3.3431
Finfgeld‐Connett, D. (2010). Generalizability and transferability of meta‐synthesis research findings. Journal of advanced nursing, 66(2), 246-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05250.x
 Gambier, L. (2024). From green advertising to sustainable behavior: a systematic literature review through the lens of value-belief-norm framework. International journal of advertising, 43(1), 53-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2199668
Gleim, M. R., McCullough, H., Sreen, N., & Pant, L. G. (2023). Is doing right all that matters in sustainability marketing? The role of fit in sustainable marketing strategies. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103124
Guedes, B., Paillard-Bardey, A. C., & Schat, A. (2020). Improving sustainable fashion marketing and advertising: A reflection on framing message and target audience. International Journal of Market Research, 62(2), 124-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785318801152
Jamini, D., Dehghani, A., & Mohammadi, A. (2024). Rural Tourism Marketing and Identification of Key Factors Affecting It with A Sustainable Development Approach (Case Study: Palangan Village in Kamyaran County). Green Development Management Studies, 3(2), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2024.7429.1106 (In Persian)
Jiang, W., Ko, E., & Chae, H. (2019). The effect of sustainable fashion brand's advertising color and expression on consumers' emotions and perceptions-focus on Instagram. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 21(4), 432-451. https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2019.21.4.432
Kim, C., Jeon, H. G., & Lee, K. C. (2020). Discovering the role of emotional and rational appeals and hidden heterogeneity of consumers in advertising copies for sustainable marketing. Sustainability, 12(12), 5189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125189
Kowalska, M. (2020). SME managers’ perceptions of sustainable marketing mix in different socioeconomic conditions—a comparative analysis of Sri Lanka and Poland. Sustainability, 12(24), 10659. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410659
Kratschmann, M., & Dütschke, E. (2021). Selling the sun: A critical review of the sustainability of solar energy marketing and advertising in Germany. Energy Research & Social Science, 73, 101919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101919
Lee, Y., & Lin, C. A. (2022). The effects of a sustainable vs conventional apparel advertisement on consumer perception of CSR image and attitude toward the brand. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 27(2), 388-403. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2021-0051
Liu, Y. L., Yuen, T. W., & Jiang, H. L. (2019). An experimental study of consumption orientations, environmental sustainability advertising and home-sharing adoption intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(12), 4605-4627. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2018-0968
Lopes, P. R., Rosário, A. T., & Rosário, F. S. (2024). Sustainable Brand Advertising—The Green Advertising for Generation Z, a Qualitative LRSB Analyze. Platforms, 2(2), 84-100. https://doi.org/10.3390/platforms2020006
Manurung, K. L. (2023). The Impact of Sustainability Advertising on the Purchase Intention of Indonesian Consumers. Asian Journal of Research in Business and Management, 5(3), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3
Milfeld, T., & Pittman, M. (2024). Altercast framing with assertive sustainability messages: How dominant brands can motivate non-green consumers. International Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 173-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2219150
Ndlovu, S., & Ellis, D. (2022). The nature and extent of environmental sustainability advertising in magazines in a developing market. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 16(3-4), 372-399. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2022.123889
Nezhadbarnji, M., & Bashirkhodaparasti, R. (2022). Analyzing the role of skepticism green advertising and usefulness of information on intention to purchase green products with the moderating role of independent and dependent self-interpretation among users who visit organic ads on Instagram. Management Research in Iran, 26(3), 95-116. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2322200.1401.26.3.5.6 (In Persian)
Nye, E., Melendez‐Torres, G. J., & Bonell, C. (2016). Origins, methods and advances in qualitative meta‐synthesis. Review of Education, 4(1), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3065
Padidar, Sh., haghighi, M., & Hassan Gholipour Yasory, T. (2022). Effective Factors On Sustainable Marketing - Case Study: Detergent Industry. Management Research in Iran, 26(1), 227-244. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2322200.1401.26.1.9.6 (In Persian)
Peterson, M., Minton, E. A., Liu, R. L., & Bartholomew, D. E. (2021). Sustainable marketing and consumer support for sustainable businsses. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.018
Rathee, S. (2024). Introduction to the special issue on the role of sustainability in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2290857
Rathee, S., & Milfeld, T. (2023). Sustainability advertising: literature review and framework for future research. International Journal of Advertising, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2175300
Reif, C. E. (2017). Informational advertising in the context of sustainable fashion: the influence of information usage in advertising on consumers’ perceptions and willingness to purchase (Doctoral dissertation). http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/22724
Russell, S. V., Padfield, R. W., & Bretter, C. (2023). An introduction to A research agenda for sustainability and business (pp. 1-17). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107719.00008
Sabaghi, S., Rousta, A., & Asayesh, F. (2024). Social branding model in line with sustainable development (case study: Domdaran dairy company). Green Development Management Studies, 3(2), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2024.7433.1107 (In Persian)
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. springer publishing company.
Sander, F., Föhl, U., Walter, N., & Demmer, V. (2021). Green or social? An analysis of environmental and social sustainability advertising and its impact on brand personality, credibility and attitude. Journal of Brand Management, 28, 429-445. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-021-00236-8
Septianto, F., Seo, Y., & Zhao, F. (2022). The effects of competence and warmth appeals on luxury and sustainable brand advertising: the moderating role of construal level. Journal of Advertising, 51(3), 369-384.
Son, M. Y. (2016). A study on the assessment of the index for sustainable development of on-line fashion advertising. Journal of Fashion Business, 20(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2016.20.1.53
Taylor, C. R., & Carlson, L. (2021). The future of advertising research: New directions and research needs. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 29(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2020.1860681
Weinmayer, K., Garaus, M., & Wagner, U. (2024). The impact of corporate sustainability performance on advertising efficiency. Or Spectrum, 46(1), 175-209. https://doi.org/10.1007 / s00291-023-00717-z
Whang, H., Ko, E., Zhang, T., & Mattila, P. (2015). Brand popularity as an advertising cue affecting consumer evaluation on sustainable brands: A comparison study of Korea, China, and Russia. International Journal of Advertising, 34(5), 789-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1057381
Xu, W., Jin, X., & Fu, R. (2021). The influence of scarcity and popularity appeals on sustainable products. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1340-1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.014
Yaputra, H., Risqiani, R., Lukito, N., & Sukarno, K. P. (2023). Pengaruh Green Marketing, Sustainable Advertising, Eco Packaging/Labeling Terhadap Green Purchasing Behavior (Studi Pada Kendaraan Listrik). Journal of Indonesia Marketing Association (IMA), 2(1), 71-90. https://journal-ima.org/index.php/IMA/article/view/25
Zhang, X., Ding, X., Ma, L., & Wang, G. (2018). Identifying factors preventing sustainable brand loyalty among consumers: A mixed methods approach. Sustainability, 10(12), 4685. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124685
Zhou, T., Kabir, S. F., Cao, L., & Fini, E. H. (2021). Effects of ultraviolet exposure on physicochemical and mechanical properties of bio-modified rubberized bitumen: Sustainability promotion and resource conservation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 171, 105626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105626
Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta‐synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of advanced nursing, 53(3), 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03721.x