Identifying Key Drivers of Business Strategy among Technology Entrepreneurs in the Circular Economy

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. student of business policy, Imamreza International University, Mashhad, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Management, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Management Department, Imamreza International University, Mashhad, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
In today’s business landscape, technology drives firms toward continuous innovation and sustained growth. The proliferation of technology-based innovative enterprises has intensified competition in product markets. In such a dynamic environment, only those firms that adopt an appropriate strategy—balancing market positioning with ongoing innovation—achieve long-term success. A review of existing business strategy frameworks and strategic design schools reveals that none, in isolation, adequately addresses the unique strategic needs of innovators and technology-driven ventures. Indeed, contemporary business strategy appears to be a more complex and context-sensitive construct than what traditional strategic paradigms or expert prescriptions suggest. This underscores the necessity of identifying the key factors that shape effective business strategies for innovators. Although the growing number of innovative firms—particularly startups—might suggest a diminishing need for formal strategic planning, this view is misleading. Even as their numbers increase, these firms still require well-articulated business strategies to navigate growth trajectories and ensure sustainability. Thus, the need to identify contextually relevant business strategies for innovative enterprises remains strong (Fermihani Farahani et al., 2024; Farghani & Salehi, 2024). Currently, Iran hosts more than 7,000 knowledge-based companies, which collectively contribute approximately 60% to the national economy. These firms can achieve sustainable success only if they develop and implement sound commercial strategies that enable market entry and operational continuity. Consequently, it is both necessary and urgent to identify the factors that effectively shape business strategies for innovators in a manner aligned with their unique operational and competitive contexts. Over the past few decades, environmental disruptions, escalating complexity, and increasing dynamism have significantly shortened product life cycles and the useful lifespan of technologies. In this context, only firms that continuously innovate can ensure their survival. Moreover, innovative firms are not only growing in number but also account for a substantial share of new innovations introduced to the market—innovations that, in turn, demand strategic guidance for scaling and commercialization. If innovation is indeed a critical driver of competitive advantage, then failing to develop appropriate business strategies for innovators constitutes a fundamental oversight. Conventional strategic models—largely formulated during the second and third industrial revolutions, when circular economy principles, modern innovation ecosystems, and sustainability imperatives were not yet central to business discourse—are ill-suited to today’s entrepreneurial and technological realities. Addressing this gap is therefore a pressing theoretical and practical imperative. Given the evident lacuna in both academic literature and managerial practice regarding the determinants of business strategy for innovative firms, this study seeks to answer the following research questions: What is the conceptual framework of factors influencing the business strategy of innovative firms? What dimensions and components constitute this framework?
 
Materials and Methods
This study adopts an interpretive research philosophy, is applied in purpose, and employs a qualitative, inductive approach. In qualitative research, several methodological strategies are available—including case study, phenomenology, ethnography, and meta-synthesis (also referred to as thematic synthesis or systematic qualitative review). Given the research objective—to develop a comprehensive conceptual framework of factors influencing business strategy among innovative firms—the meta-synthesis approach was deemed the most appropriate methodological strategy. Participants were selected through purposeful sampling and comprised 15 key informants with strategic expertise in innovation and business development: four founders of innovative startups, four university professors specializing in strategy and entrepreneurship, three professional business strategists, and four senior executives from technology-driven innovative firms. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews, each lasting approximately 60 minutes on average. Theoretical saturation was achieved by the 15th interview, at which point no new themes or insights emerged, and further interviews were deemed unnecessary. Data analysis followed thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006), involving systematic coding and iterative refinement of emerging patterns. To ensure trustworthiness, we applied Krefting’s (1991) criteria for rigor in qualitative research, specifically:
Triangulation (methodological and data source),
Member checking (participant validation of interpretations), and
Audit trail (transparent documentation of analytical decisions).
Inter-coder reliability was assessed using a two-coder agreement procedure. Both the primary researcher and an independent co-coder independently coded the transcripts. Inter-coder agreement was calculated using the following formula:
Inter-coder agreement (%) = (2 × Number of agreements) / Total number of codes × 100
An agreement rate of 80% was achieved, which falls within the widely accepted threshold of 80–100% for qualitative reliability in social science research.
 
Findings
The end of the analysis process of themes and categories led to the extraction of 4 main categories, 65 themes and 118 primary codes. 4 dimensions of strategy, marketing, organization and environment are effective in the business strategy of innovators.
 
Discussion and conclusion
Innovators play a pivotal role in driving current economic activity, and supporting them to reach maturity—particularly by enabling sustainable revenue streams within a circular economy—requires focusing on the key factors that drive their business success. Findings highlight business strategy as the most critical dimension, consistent with Zangiyan (2021) and Kim (2016). Specifically, strategic agility, access to capital, and value creation emerged as core components—suggesting that innovators’ success hinges more on how flexibly they adapt their strategies than on rigid planning. Agile strategies streamline unnecessary processes and are especially effective in innovation-driven firms that co-create value with customers in real time. Marketing was identified as another vital dimension. Transforming novel technologies into impactful, user-friendly products or services requires deep alignment with customer needs and preferences—a finding echoed in Adelkhani & Kashani (2018). Thus, innovators must prioritize thorough market research before finalizing their strategies. On the organizational structure front, agility and structural integration are essential. Project-based teams outperform traditional bureaucratic, function-based hierarchies in fostering innovation—a conclusion supported by Keshavarz et al. (2021). Finally, participants emphasized market analysis as a key environmental factor, driven by the high volatility, short innovation life cycles, and growing competition in the tech sector. Effective use of modern market research tools to analyze target markets is not just advantageous—it’s critical for survival, aligning again with Keshavarz et al. (2021).

Keywords

Main Subjects


Adelkhani, H., & Haqshana Kashani, F. (2018). Designing and compiling the strategic and marketing strategies of Sepeh Bank with a view to the future. Strategic Management Research Quarterly, 25(75), 123–153. [In Persian]
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2014). Innovation ecosystems. In P. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation management (pp. 204–288). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.013.012
Delorme, D., Boldrini, J. C., & Schieb-Bienfait, N. (2019). From Industry 4.0 to sustainable innovation ecosystems 4.0: What challenges for the innovation intermediaries? In 36th IASP World Conference on Science Parks and Areas of Innovation: The 4th Industrial Revolution—Areas of innovation and science parks as key boosters for a successful transition. HAL. https://hal.science/hal-03546250
Eskandari Sani, M., & Sofalgar, S. (2022). Integrating green and circular economy: A novel approach to sustainable income in Birjand. Green Development Management Studies, 1(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgmd.2023.6171.1023
Farmahini Farahani, S., Khamseh, A., & Bayat Tork, A. (2024). Analyzing the dimensions and effective components in determining the value of startups with the approach green technology valuation. Green Development Management Studies, 3(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2024.7153.1067
Felix, A. (2022). Open innovation strategy: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2022-0638
Feng, L., Lu, J., & Wang, J. (2021). A systematic review of enterprise innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 13(10), Article 5742. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105742
Forghani, M., & Salehi, S. (2024). Examining the impact of green intellectual capital on green business strategies: The key role of absorptive capacity and environmental ethics. Green Development Management Studies, 3(2), 247–269. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2024.7331.1087
Gaitan, E. (2022). Developing and sharing threat intelligence: Strategies for small and medium-sized businesses [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University].
Ghorbi, S. S., & Rahman Sarasht, H. (2022). How to empower strategic orientation for innovation ecosystems in technology-based business (in Iran). Specialized Journal of Progress and Excellence Research, 4(2). [In Persian]
Kayembe, C., & Nel, D. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for education in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. African Journal of Public Affairs, 11(3), 79–94. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-19605d342e
Keshavarz, S., Yaghoubi, N., & Deghati, A. (2021). Evaluation of success factors of knowledge-based companies of Fars’ Science and Technology Park using structural equation modeling. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 11(1), 35–50. [In Persian]
Khaleghi, F., & Mohammadpoor Zarandi, M. E. (2021). Identifying and ranking business and information technology alignment challenges: A strategy for strategic alignment (Case study: Southern Steel Company). Journal of Business Management, 13(49), 242–260. [In Persian]
Khodadad Hosseini, S.H. & Azizi, S. (2016). Strategic management and planning: comprehensive plans. Safar Publishing House: Tehran. [In Persian]
Kim, J. (2016). The platform business model and strategy: A dynamic analysis of the value chain and platform business [Unpublished manuscript].
Klotins, E., Unterkalmsteiner, M., & Gorschek, T. (2023). Software engineering in start-up companies: An analysis of 88 experience reports. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.12139
Kordnaij, A. (2021). Strategic thinking and management: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Trite Modares University Press. [In Persian]
López Cuesta, L., & Franch Gutiérrez, J. (2014). Applying business strategy models in organizations. In Proceedings of the 7th International i Workshop 2014* (Paper 6). Thessaloniki, Greece. http://hdl.handle.net/2117/23567
Mason, C., Anderson, M., Kessl, T., & Hruskova, M. (2020). Promoting student enterprise: Reflections on a university start-up programme. Local Economy, 35(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094219894907
McClain, N. E. (2022). Innovative strategies that enhance competitiveness and profitability within global economies [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies, 13561. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/13561
Nademi, Y., & Dalvandi, M. (2023). The role of globalization in the relationship between energy consumption and economic growth. Green Development Management Studies, 2(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgmd.2023.6191.1025
Nooraie, H. (2020). Comparative analysis of the theoretical and empirical of industrial revolution in the world in order to determine the characteristics of desirable industrial development. Journal of Industrial Management Studies, 7(28), 179–212. [In Persian]
O’Keefe, M. (2012). On the classification of business strategy [Doctoral dissertation, King’s College London].
Olfat, L., Arabi, S., Amiri, M., & Ghazinoory, S. S. (2011). An empirical investigation of linkages between technology strategy with business strategy and performance in Iran’s electronics industry. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 3(3), 1–19. [In Persian]
Rajaei, Z., Pour, S., & Dehghani, A. (2022). Examining the effect of intellectual capital and green technological innovations on the knowledge management of South Khorasan Oil Company employees. Green Development Management Studies, 1(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.22077/jgmd.2022.5703.1009
Razak, N. A., Pangil, F., Zin, M. L. M., Yunus, N. A. M., & Asnawi, N. H. (2016). Theories of knowledge sharing behavior in business strategy. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30163-0
Ritson, N. (2019). Business strategy and strategic planning: A definition and definitive guide. [Publisher not identified].
Safari, H., Sadat, M. M., & Sadabadi, A. A. (2016). Designing competitive strategies through apply of judo strategy and blue ocean strategy in BSC model. Journal of Business Management, 8(3), 363–607. [In Persian]
Santisteban, J., & Mauricio, D. (2017). Systematic literature review of critical success factors of information technology startups. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 23(2), 1–23.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Vagfi, S. H., & Nilofari, Z. (2021). The effect of business strategy on company performance with emphasis on management ability. Innovation Management and Operational Strategies, 2(3), 285–305. [In Persian]
Zangian, S., Maleki MinBashRazgah, M., Feiz, D., & Zarei, A. (2022). Identifying of digital business strategy dimensions to enter international markets. Journal of International Business Administration, 5(1), 45–78. [In Persian]