Governance for Sustainability: Identifying and Ranking Critical Dimensions of Government Decentralization

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master's student, Department of Public Administration, Electronics Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Research on government decentralization is well established both globally and domestically. However, a notable gap persists in the literature: few studies have systematically examined the relationship between decentralization and sustainable development. This gap is especially pronounced in the Iranian context, where—despite some early efforts (e.g., Obedeh & Mousavi, 2009)—empirical investigations linking decentralization to sustainability remain scarce. Moreover, much of the existing sustainability discourse has narrowly focused on environmental, economic, and social pillars, often overlooking the critical role of governance structures, particularly decentralization, in enabling sustainable outcomes. Addressing this lacuna, the present study aims to identify and prioritize key dimensions of government decentralization that contribute to sustainable development.
 
Methodology
This study adopts an applied, non-experimental descriptive design. The research population comprises 25 experts in public administration, including 16 university faculty members and 9 senior officials from government organizations. Participants were selected through purposive sampling using the snowball technique. Data were collected via a structured expert questionnaire grounded in a nine-dimensional conceptual framework. Reliability was assessed using the inconsistency index, while validity was evaluated through the Lausche coefficient. Factor prioritization was conducted using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision-making method widely employed in policy and governance research.
 
Findings
Based on the results, it is clear that the index of monitoring local conditions with a weight of 0.192 is the first priority. The index of attracting local funds with a weight of 0.084 is in the second priority. The index of financing by the government with a weight of 0.075 is in the third priority. The index of determining goals based on the principles of sustainability with a weight of 0.075 is in the fourth priority. The index of alignment of sustainability goals with the needs of the local community with a weight of 0.073 is in the fifth priority. The index of trust in local managers with a weight of 0.065 is in the sixth priority. The budgeting index based on sustainability goals with a weight of 0.063 is ranked seventh. The index of commitment to accountability with a weight of 0.054 is in the eighth priority. The index of increasing the authority of local institutions with a weight of 0.049 is in the ninth priority. The education index of local managers with a weight of 0.049 is in the tenth priority.
 
Discussion and Conclusion
The criterion of contextual targeting—defined as aligning policies and governance decisions with local conditions—emerged as the highest priority, with a normalized weight of 0.339. This underscores a fundamental principle of effective decentralization: one-size-fits-all mandates are ill-suited to diverse regional contexts. Leading decentralized systems worldwide calibrate the scope of authority and resource allocation to subnational governments (e.g., provinces, municipalities) based on continuous monitoring of local socioeconomic, environmental, and institutional conditions. This finding resonates with Ishrodoost (2021), who identifies the absence of region-specific targeting as a key barrier to decentralization in Iran, and with Fua’s (2022) analysis of Russia’s decentralization reforms, which emphasizes the necessity of tailoring governance structures to regional realities.
The second-highest priority was financial considerations (weight: 0.222). Globally, the fiscal relationship between central and local governments constitutes a critical determinant of local autonomy and service delivery capacity. In Iran, where local authorities suffer from chronic revenue shortages and limited fiscal autonomy, strengthening intergovernmental financial mechanisms is essential. Embedding decentralization within a good governance framework—characterized by fiscal transparency, equitable resource distribution, and performance-based budgeting—can help address systemic challenges such as bureaucratic inefficiency, rising administrative costs, and the central government’s limited responsiveness to local needs. Only through such reforms can municipalities establish sustainable economic foundations and stable revenue streams. These insights align with prior studies by Zarkhani et al. (2018) and Mohammadi (2008).
Third in priority is local sustainability capacity building (weight: 0.207). This entails a systematic, multi-level approach to strengthening the capabilities of local institutions, communities, and leaders to plan, implement, and sustain development initiatives. Effective capacity building integrates leadership development, community engagement, organizational learning, and institutional adaptation to foster resilience and well-being at the local level. As DeCorby et al. (2018) argue, local capacity is a prerequisite for meaningful devolution of power; without it, decentralization risks becoming symbolic rather than substantive. Similarly, Choi et al. (2019) highlight the centrality of local capacity in UN-supported decentralization efforts in developing countries.
Transparency and reporting ranked fourth (weight: 0.134). Robust accountability mechanisms—including systematic data collection, performance monitoring, and public reporting—are vital for ensuring that decentralized authorities remain aligned with policy objectives, learn from implementation outcomes, and adapt decision-making accordingly. This finding is consistent with Zuidervik et al. (2021) and Lin et al. (2018), who emphasize transparency as a cornerstone of effective local governance.
Finally, human resource performance received the lowest weight (0.097), though it remains strategically significant. Skilled, motivated, and ethically grounded personnel are essential for translating decentralization policies into practice. Human capital constitutes a core organizational asset, particularly in public institutions, where competent staff can drive innovation and sustainable performance. Chigbo (2021) identifies human resource competencies as a key enabler of decentralization, a view echoed by Rashidi et al. (2021) in their analysis of administrative decentralization in Iran.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abbas, S., Ahmed, Z., Sinha, A., Mariev, O., & Mahmood, F. (2024). Toward fostering environmental innovation in OECD countries: Do fiscal decentralization, carbon pricing, and renewable energy investments matter. Gondwana Research, 127, 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.03.002
Adam, J. N., Adams, T., Gerber, J. D., & Haller, T. (2021). Decentralization for increased sustainability in natural resource management? Two cautionary cases from Ghana. Sustainability, 13(12), 6885. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126885
Ahmad, M., & Satrovic, E. (2023). Role of economic complexity and government intervention in environmental sustainability: Is decentralization critical. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 138000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138000
Amoushahi, S., Salmanmahiny, A., Moradi, H., Mikaeili Tabrizi, A. R., & Galán, C. (2023). An Analysis of the Importance of Sustainable Urban Development Indicators in Iran and its Comparison with Global Indicators. Town and Country Planning, 15(1), 53-71. doi: 10.22059/jtcp.2022.348227.670348
Bandelow, N. C., & Hornung, J. (2022). How do good governance and democratic quality affect policy performance. European Policy Analysis, 8(2), 130-135.
Benkarim, A., & Imbeau, D. (2021). Organizational Commitment and Lean Sustainability: Literature Review and Directions for Future Research. Sustainability, 13(6), 3357. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063357
Choi, J., Naderpajouh, N., Yu, D. J., & Hastak, M. (2019). Capacity Building for an Infrastructure System in Case of Disaster Using the System's Associated Social and Technical Components. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(4), 04019013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000697
Coccia, M. (2021). How a good governance of institutions can reduce poverty and inequality in society?. In Legal-Economic Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and Management (pp. 65-94). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60978-8_4
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Validity and reliability. In Research methods in education (pp. 245-284). Routledge.
DeCorby-Watson, K., Mensah, G., Bergeron, K., Abdi, S., Rempel, B., & Manson, H. (2018). Effectiveness of capacity building interventions relevant to public health practice: a systematic review. BMC Public health, 18(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5591-6.
Dias, G. P., & Silva, M. (2022). Revealing performance factors for supply chain sustainability: a systematic literature review from a social capital perspective. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.037
Dick-Sagoe, C. (2020). Decentralization for improving the provision of public services in developing countries: A critical review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1804036. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1804036
Etaat, J & Mussavi, S.Z., (2011). Decentralization and Sustainable Development in Iran, Journal of Researches of human geography, 42, 1 (71), 89- 109. https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_24444_0.html?lang=en [In Persian]
Farghani, M; & Salehi, S (2024), Investigating the impact of green intellectual capital on green business strategy with the role of green absorptive capacity and environmental ethics of the organization in Dana Rubber Manufacturing Company, Green Development Management Studies, 3(2), 124-151. doi: 10.22077/jgdms.2024.7331.1087. [In Persian]
Foa, R. S. (2022). Decentralization, historical state capacity and public goods provision in Post-Soviet Russia. World Development, 152, 105807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105807
Hanson, A. H. (2022). Decentralization. In Planning and the Politicians (pp. 104-126). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003259787-10/decentralization-hanson
Hoang, D. P., Chu, L. K., To, T. T., & Pham, N. X. (2024). Exploring the nexus between fiscal decentralization and ecological sustainability: a fresh perspective from the moderating role of geopolitical risk and updated international evidence. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-31989-9
Karimi, M. S., Hoveida, R., & Siadat, S. A., (2023). Paradigm Model of Decentralization of the Iranian Education System. Management and Planning in Educational Systems. 16, 1, 123-148. Dio: 10.48308/MPES.2023.102815. [In Persian]
Keshvardoost, S., & Ahmadi, H., (2021). Investigating the obstacles and challenges of decentralization within the framework of Islamic councils in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iranian Journal of Publice Policy. 7, 1, 175- 197. Dio: 10.22059/JPPOLICY.2021.81994. [In Persian]
Lin, R., & Chen, J. J. (2022). Multinational Corporate Governance: A Network Governance Framework. Springer Books, 45-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7703-8_4
Mohammadi, N., (2021). Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Development During the Country's Development Plans, Scientific Progress and Development of Kermanshah, 1 (2), 82-105. dio: 10.22034/MPO.2021.132323. [In Persian]
Østergaard, P. A., Duic, N., Noorollahi, Y., & Kalogirou, S. (2022). Renewable energy for sustainable development. Renewable Energy, 199, 1145-1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.094
Rashidi, S, Kamani, S. M. H., Mooghali, A., (2022), Investigating the effective factors on inter-organizational coordination in disaster crisis management Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province Crisis Related Organizations. Journal of Emergency Management. 11, 1-13. https://www.joem.ir/article_702183.html?lang=fa [In Persian]
Sabbaghi, Sh; Rousta, A; & Asayesh, F (2024), social branding model in the direction of sustainable development (case study: Domdaran Dairy Company), Green Development Management Studies, 3(2), 124-151. doi: 10.22077/jgdms.2024.7433.1107. [In Persian]
Satrovic, E., Zafar, M. W., & Suntraruk, P. (2024). Achieving ecological sustainability in European Union: The role of fiscal decentralization and green innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141316
Shan, S., Ahmad, M., Tan, Z., Adebayo, T. S., Li, R. Y. M., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). The role of energy prices and non-linear fiscal decentralization in limiting carbon emissions: tracking environmental sustainability. Energy, 234, 121243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121243
Sun, Y., Guan, W., Razzaq, A., Shahzad, M., & An, N. B. (2022). Transition towards ecological sustainability through fiscal decentralization, renewable energy and green investment in OECD countries. Renewable Energy, 190, 385-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.099
Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023). Striving towards environmental sustainability in the BRICS economies: the combined influence of fiscal decentralization and environmental innovation. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 30(2), 111-125. DOI:10.1080/13504509.2022.2123411
Wu, Y., Hu, J., Irfan, M., & Hu, M. (2024). Vertical decentralization, environmental regulation, and enterprise pollution: An evolutionary game analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 349, 119449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119449
Xie, P., Xiao, W., Cai, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2024). Does decentralization improve natural resources and government efficiency?. Resources Policy, 91, 104865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104865
Yaqoubi, Noor Mohammad; and Salehi, Motahara. (2023). Examining and explaining the implementation of renewable resources management policies in line with the sustainable development of Sistan region. Green Development Management Studies, 2(2), 124-151. doi: 10.22077/jgdms.2024.7003.1050 [In Persian]
Zare Abdansari, M; Naghizadeh Baghi, A; & Naghizadeh Naghi, M., (2023), Identification of sustainable development strategies and green management in the design of football stadiums, Green Development Management Studies, 2(2), 16-24. doi: 10.22077/jgdms.2024.7114.106. [In Persian]
Zarghani, S. H. & Ahmadi, E., (2019).Good Governance in Local States: Decentralization Approach. Government research. 5 (19), 107-138. https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2019.18074.234 [In Persian]
Zerbian, T., & de Luis Romero, E. (2023). The role of cities in good governance for food security: lessons from Madrid’s urban food strategy. Territory, Politics, Governance, 11(4), 794-812. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2021.1873174
Zhang, C., & Xiang, X. (2023). Fiscal decentralization, environmental policy stringency, and resource sustainability: Panacea or Pandora's box in high resource consuming countries. Resources Policy, 83, 103544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103544
Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y. C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101577. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577