The Relationship Between Green Financing and Green Innovation: A Game Theory Approach to Companies' Risk-Taking Behavior

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate of Management, Dehaghan Branch, Islamic Azad University.Dehaghan, Iran

2 Associate ProfessorDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

3 MA. Candidate Department of Management, Dehaghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Today, the greenness of the economy aligns with people's development in business and infrastructure, holding a special place aimed at protecting the environment while promoting economic growth and investment. In recent years, significant attention has been paid to green financing. Companies opting for green innovation may encounter higher risks due to the elevated costs associated with green technology innovation, including substantial initial investments in green projects and the spillover effects of green innovative products. Risk tolerance emerges as a critical factor in this context. However, the interplay between green financing, green innovation, and risk-taking has been underexplored in existing studies. Green innovation encompasses unique or modified systems, processes, products, and practices that provide environmental benefits and contribute to sustainability. It reflects an organization's capabilities and environmental actions. The dynamic game model serves as a powerful analytical tool to examine the choices of various stakeholders simultaneously. This study adopts a theoretical analysis framework based on two key considerations: first, using evolutionary game theory to explore how green financing influences the choice of innovation modes, explaining why it affects green innovation behavior but not general innovation behavior; second, demonstrating how market equilibrium shifts toward green innovation by accounting for firms' competitive dynamics.
 
Methodology
This study follows three fundamental steps: (1) identifying green components in the banking industry, (2) analyzing the impact of green financing on green innovation through game theory, and (3) examining the role of risk tolerance in green financing and innovation. Using the Delphi method, we identified effective green components within the banking sector through case studies of two Isfahan dairy companies—Pegah Isfahan and Aalist Najaf Abad—that produce homogeneous dairy products. We discuss strategy selection and dynamic evolution in green technology innovation, focusing on evolutionary equilibrium strategies. A game theory model was employed to investigate the relationship between green innovation and green financing, followed by an analysis of how companies' risk-taking behaviors influence these dynamics. Robust standard errors and cluster standard errors were utilized to estimate Tobit and Poisson models, with results presented using MATLAB software.
 
Findings
The proposed game theory model demonstrates that enhanced green financing increases the likelihood of companies initially adopting green innovation modes. Additionally, our findings indicate that the positive impact of green finance on green innovation is stronger for firms with lower risk tolerance levels. Furthermore, the effect is more pronounced when enterprises exhibit reduced risk-taking tendencies. These insights offer valuable guidance for advancing green development. The conclusions remain robust across various estimation methods, explanatory variables, and sensitivity analyses.
 
Discussion and Conclusion
The game theory model presented herein confirms that green financing in the banking industry effectively promotes green innovation. Empirical results from the studied companies corroborate the theoretical analysis. Lower organizational risk-taking amplifies the impact of green finance on green innovation, providing actionable insights for sustainable development. Regarding the financial mechanisms supporting green technology innovation, the following recommendations are proposed:

Governments should regulate subsidies transparently to support green finance development by launching targeted financial subsidy programs and establishing performance evaluation systems.
Pilot policies in green finance zones can foster industrial growth, leveraging market-oriented mechanisms such as national carbon trading markets to incentivize the conversion of green innovation value into economic benefits.
To engage more stakeholders in green financing ecosystems, capital sources must be diversified, attracting broader market participation. Simultaneously, enterprises should enhance risk management, secure low-cost financing, and utilize operational resources to develop green technologies, thereby improving self-sufficiency.

Finally, integrating environmental costs and benefits into financial decision-making is essential. Redirecting financial flows away from polluting activities and toward environmentally beneficial initiatives will strengthen the green economy. Limitations of this study include reliance on data from a single organization within the Iranian dairy industry, which restricts generalizability. The framework reflects local expert perspectives, so results may vary in other contexts or populations. Moreover, since the data were collected during a specific time period, extending the findings to other periods requires caution.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Asgari, V., Kamyabi, Y., Khalilpour, M. (2022). Presenting a model for overconfidence, risk preference, mass behavior and inefficient investment of managers (game theory based approach). Investment knowledge) 439-462. (43) 11. http://www.jik-ifea.ir/article_19891.html (In Persian)
Bai, R, & Lin, B. (2022). Are residents willing to pay for garbage recycling: Evidence from a survey in Chinese first-tier cities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 95(April), 106789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106789
Balhasan, S., Alnahhal, M., Shawan, S., Salah, B., Saleem, W., & Tabash, M. I. (2022). Optimization of Exploration and Production Sharing Agreements Using the Maxi-Min and Nash Solutions. Energies, 15(23), 8970.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/en15238970
Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., & Saffar, W. (2013). The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatization. Journal of financial economics, 108(3), 641-658.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.12.007
Caplan, A. J., & Oladi, R. (2018). Green competition, hybrid equilibrium, and establishment of a resale market. International Review of Economics & Finance, 58, 259-269.‌https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.03.025
Du, G., Yu, M, Sun, C, & Han, Z. (2021). Green innovation effect of emission trading policy on pilot areas and neighboring areas: An analysis based on the spatial econometric model. Energy Policy, 156(June), 112431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112431
Eslamloueyan, K. and Ostadzad, A. H. (2015). Green Taxes in Energy and Final Goods Sectors in Iran: A Game-Theoretic Approach. Iranian Energy Economics, 5(17), 1-37.  https://doi.org/10.22054/jiee.2017.7161(In Persian)
Fan, G, Wang, X. L., Zhang, L. W., & Zhu, H. P. (2003). Marketization index for China’ s provinces. Economic Research Journal, 03. https://jik.srbiau.ac.ir/article_21731.html
Hajaran, F. Radfer, R. Divandari, A. Fadaei, D. David. (2022). Providing a green banking model based on innovation management components to gain sustainable competitive advantage. Financial Economics, 16(58), 257-280. https://www.sid.ir/paper/960592/fa (In Persian)
He, L., Liu, R., Zhong, Z., Wang, D., & Xia, Y. (2019). Can green financial development promote renewable energy investment efficiency? A consideration of bank credit. Renewable Energy, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .renene.2019.05.059
He, L., Liu, R., Zhong, Z., Wang, D., & Xia, Y. (2019). Can green financial development promote renewable energy investment efficiency? A consideration of bank credit. Renewable Energy, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .renene.2019.05.059
Huang, Z., Liao, G, & Li, Z. (2019). Loaning scale and government subsidy for promoting green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144(July 2018), 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .techfore.2019.04.023
Jabari Piriosfian, J., Nobari, A. (2020). Identification and ranking of green investment factors. Investment knowledge. 9(34) 71-107. https://sid.ir/paper/387765/fa (In Persian)
John, K., Litov, L., & Yeung, B. (2008). Corporate governance and risk-taking. Journal of Finance, 63(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01372.x
Lamperti, F., Bosetti, V., Roventini, A., Tavoni, M., & Treibich, T. (2021). Three green financial policies to address climate risks. Journal of Financial Stability, 54, 100875.‌
Lee, C. C, & Lee, C. C. (2022). How does green finance affect green total factor productivity? Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105863
Li, Z., Kuo, T. H., Siao-Yun, W., & The Vinh, L. (2022). Role of green finance, volatility and risk in promoting the investments in Renewable Energy Resources in the post-covid-Resources Policy, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102563
Lin, B. & Bai, R., (2024). Green finance and green innovation: Theoretical analysis based on game theory and empirical evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 89, 760-774.
Liu, C, & Xiong, M. (2022). Green finance reform and corporate innovation: Evidence from China £-. Finance Research Letters, 48(71772178), 102993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102993
Liu, Y., Zhu, J., Li, E. Y., Meng, Z., & Song, Y. (2020). Environmental regulation, green technological innovation, and eco-efficiency: The case of Yangtze river economic belt in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119993
Lou, Z., Chen, S., Yin, W., Zhang, C, & Yu, X. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty and firm innovation: Evidence from a risk-taking perspective. International Review of Economics and Finance, 77(September 2021), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.09.014
Mielke, J., & Steudle, G. A. (2018). Green investment and coordination failure: an investors' perspective. Ecological Economics, 150, 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.018
Mishra, R, & Mishra, O. N. (2019). Prioritising dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation for supply chain flexibility development in an uncertain environment. Journal of Manufacturing Technology
Mohammadi, A., Rahnamay Roodposhti, F., Hemmati, H. and Yazdanian, N. (2023). Presenting a crowdfunding risk model in fintech-based businesses. Journal of Investment Knowledge, 12(46), 733-756. https://jik.srbiau.ac.ir/article_21731.html (In Persian)
Nie, P. Y., Chen, Y. H., Yang, Y. C, et al. (2016). Subsidies in carbon finance for promoting renewable energy development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 677-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.018
Porter, M. E. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4).
Roper, S., & Tapinos, E. (2016). Taking risks in the face of certainty: An exploratory analysis of green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.037
Roper, S., & Tapinos, E. (2016). Taking risks in the face of uncertainty: An exploratory analysis of green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .techfore.2016.07.037
Salimi Zawiya, S.G. (2020). Examining the relationship between green supply chain and green innovation and green performance. Quarterly magazine of strategic management in industrial systems (former industrial management). 118-131. (50) 14. https://journals.iau.ir/article_672874.html (In Persian)
Song, M., Xie, Q., & Shen, Z. (2021). Impact of green credit on high-efficiency utilization of energy in China considering environmental constraints. Energy Policy, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .enpol.2021.112267
Tan, Y., Lin, F., & Hu, C. (2016). How continuing exporters set the price? Theory and empirical evidence from China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.03.009
Tolliver, C., Fujii, H., Keeley, A. R., & Managi, S. (2021). Green innovation and finance in Asia. Asian Economic Policy Review, 16(1), 67-87.‌
Wang, C, Nie, P. Y., Peng, D. H., & Li, Z. H. (2017). Green insurance subsidy for promoting clean production innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.145
Wang, X., Zhao, H., & Bi, K. (2021). The measurement of green finance index and the development forecast of green finance in China. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 28, 263-285.‌ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-021-00483-7
Wu, H., Hao, Y., & Ren, S. (2020). How do environmental regulation and environmental decentralization affect green total factor energy efficiency: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104880
Wu, J., Liu, B., Zeng, Y., & Luo, H. (2022). Good for the firm, good for the society? Causal evidence of the impact of equity incentives on a firm's green investment. International Review of Economics & Finance, 77, 435-449.‌https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.10.013
Xiang, X., Liu, C, & Yang, M. (2022). Who is financing corporate green innovation? International Review of Economics and Finance, 78(May 2015), 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.12.011
Xie, H., Ouyang, Z., & Choi, Y. (2020). Characteristics and influencing factors of green finance development in the Yangtze river delta of China: Analysis based on the spatial durbin model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229753
Yang, J., Shi, D., & Yang, W. (2022). Stringent environmental regulation and capital structure: The effect of NEPL on deleveraging the high polluting firms. International Review of Economics and Finance, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.02.020
Yang, Y., Su, X., & Yao, S. (2021). Nexus between green finance, fintech, and high-quality economic development: Empirical evidence from China. Resources Policy, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .resourpol.2021.102445
Yu, C. H., Wu, X., Zhang, D., Chen, S., & Zhao, J. (2021). Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China. Energy Policy, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112255
Yu, C. H., Wu, X., Zhang, D., Chen, S., & Zhao, J. (2021). Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China. Energy Policy, 153, 112255.‌
Zhang, H., Geng, C, & Wei, J. (2022). Coordinated development between green finance and environmental performance in China: The spatial-temporal difference and driving factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131150
Zhang, H., Geng, C, & Wei, J. (2022). Coordinated development between green finance and environmental performance in China: The spatial-temporal difference and driving factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131150.
Green Development Management Studies
Volume 4, Issue 1 - Serial Number 7
February 2025
Pages 23-48

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics