Green Development Management Studies

Green Development Management Studies

Symmetric and Asymmetric Effects of Oil Price, FDI, and Economic Growth on Carbon Emission

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Hatef Hazeri 1
Farzad Poureskandari Razi Abad 2
Siamak Shokouhifard 3
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran
2 M. A. in Economics, University of Mohaghegh Ardebili, Ardabil, Iran
3 Young Researchers and Elite Club, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
10.22077/jgdms.2024.7344.1094
Abstract
Empirical literature indicates that environmental degradations as well as carbon emissions are mainly caused by economic activities and subsequently economic growth. On the other hand, the prevailing laws related to the environment, especially carbon emissions and economic growth, are important and complex issues. The aim of the research is to investigate the symmetric and asymmetric effects of oil prices, foreign direct investment and economic growth on carbon emissions. This research is of the regression analysis type. The statistical population of this research includes developed and developing countries, whose economic information and statistics are available in the World Bank database. In this research, the library method was used to collect information and also to obtain the data and information needed to estimate the model in the period of 1963-2023, from the database of the World Bank, Table (PWT) and from the information of Fraser and Carto Institute Used. In this study, ARDL and non-linear ARDL methods are used to investigate the long-term and short-term symmetric and asymmetric relationship between variables. The findings of this research show that regarding the relationship between oil price and carbon emission, in developed and developing countries, the amount of carbon emission has an inverse and asymmetric relationship with oil price. Regarding the relationship between economic growth and emissions, the results show that there is a positive but asymmetric two-way relationship between economic growth and carbon emissions in the target countries. Regarding the relationship between FDI and emission in developing countries, foreign direct investment and carbon emission have a direct and positive relationship and in developed countries they have a negative relationship, and from the perspective of the symmetry and asymmetry of the effect of foreign direct investment, the results obtained in different countries are contradictory and different.
Keywords
Carbon Emission
Oil Price
Economic Growth
FDI
  • اسعدی، محمدعلی، سلیمی، شهلا و قادرزاده، حامد (1401). بررسی اثرات تغییرات ساختاری و رشد اقتصادی بر انتشار دی‌اکسید کربن در ایران: کاربرد رهیافت خود رگرسیون با وقفه‌های گسترده. انسان و محیط‌زیست، 4(20)، 163-147. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/he/Article/848061
  • کهنسال، محمدرضا و بهرامی نسب، مهسا (1398). ارزیابی رابطه مصرف انرژی و آلودگی با رشد اقتصادی در راستای سیاست‌های کلی محیط‌زیست. سیاست‌های راهبردی و کلان، 7(28)، 525-500. doi: 10.32598/JMSP.7.4.1
  • محمدیان، فرشته (1402). بررسی رابطه بین رشد اقتصادی، حجم حمل و نقل و تخریب زیست‌محیطی در ایران: رویکرد جداسازی. علمی پژوهشی اقتصاد مقداری، 20(1)، 221-195. doi: 10.22055/jqe.2022.38971.2428
  • موسوی، سیدکاظم، سلمانپور زنوز، علی و شکوهی فرد، سیامک (1396). اثر رشد اقتصادی، مصرف انرژی و توسعه مالی بر آلودگی محیط‌زیست در ایران طی دوره 1395-1365. مطالعات علوم محیط‌زیست، 2(3)، 463-454. https://www.jess.ir/article_53703.html?lang=fa
  • ناهیدی امیرخیز، محمدرضا، رحیم‌زاده، فرزاد و شکوهی فرد، سیامک (1399). بررسی رابطه رشد اقتصادی، مصرف انرژی و انتشار گازهای گلخانه‌ای (مطالعه موردی: کشورهای منتخب سازمان همکاری اسلامی). علوم و تکنولوژی محیط‌زیست، 3(22)، 26-13. 22034/JEST.2018.24919.3396: doi
  • ناهیدی امیرخیز، محمدرضا، سلمانپور زنوز، علی و شکوهی فرد، سیامک (1397). تجزیه و تحلیل تئوریکی و تجربی منحنی آلودگی محیط‌زیست کوزنتس در ایران طی دوره 1365 تا 1395. محیط‌زیست و توسعه فرابخشی، 3(59)، 29-46. doi: 1001.1.29809088.1397.3.59.3.9
  • Agras, J., & Chapman, D. (1999). A dynamic approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 28(2), 267-277. doi:10.1016/S0921- 8009(98)00040-8
  • Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 408-437. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393374
  • Behera, S. R., & Dash, D. P. (2017). The effect of urbanization, energy consumption, and foreign direct investment on the carbon dioxide emission in the SSEA (South and Southeast Asian) region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70. 96-106. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.201
  • Blanchard, O., & Johnson, D.R. (2012). Macroeconomics. Pearson. Candau, F., Dienesch, E., 2017. Pollution haven and corruption paradise. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 85, 171–192. https://books.google.hn/books?id=8eouAAAAQBAJ&hl=fr&source=gbs_navlinks_s
  • Cao, W., Chen, S., & Huang, Z. (2020). Does foreign direct investment impact energy intensity? Evidence from developing countries. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. org/10.1155/2020/5695684
  • Carvalho, T. S., & Almeida, E. (2011). The Global Environmental Kuznets Curve and The Kyoto Protocol. Anais do XXXVII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 37th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 183, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics]. https://ideas.repec.org/p/anp/en2009/183.html
  • Eakin, D. H., & Selden, T. M. (1995). Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 57(1), 85-101. org/10.1016/0047-2727(94)01449-X
  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 3914.   doi: 10.3386/w3914
  • Grossman, G.M., & Krueger, A.B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement. John M. Ohlin Program Discussion Paper. No. 158, Princeton. http://www.nber.org/papers/w3914.pdf
  • Haug, A. A., & Ucal, M. (2019). The role of trade and FDI for CO2 emissions in Turkey: Nonlinear relationships. Energy Economics, 81, 297-307. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2019.04.006
  • Jiang, L., Zhou, H. f.; Bai, L.; & Zhou, P. (2018). Does foreign direct investment drive environmental degradation in China? An empirical study based on air quality index from a spatial perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 864-872. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.048
  • Jiao, S., Subudhi, S. K., Aparicio, A., Ge, Z., Guan, B., Miura, Y., & Sharma, P. (2019). Differences in Tumor Microenvironment Dictate T Helper Lineage Polarization and Response to Immune Checkpoint Therapy. National Library of Medicine, 179(5), 1177-1190. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.029
  • Kaika, D., & Zervas, E. (2013). The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory—Part A: Concept, causes and the CO2 emissions case. Energy Policy, 67, 1382-1402. org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.131
  • Kivyiro, P., & Arminen, H. (2014). Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: Causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy, 74(C), 595-606. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.025
  • Kraft, J., & Kraft, A. (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP. The Journal of Energy and Development, 3(2), 401–403. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24806805
  • Lee, J. W. (2013). The contribution of foreign direct investment to clean energy use, carbon emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy, 55(1), 483-489. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.039
  • Levinson, A., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). Unmasking the Pollution Haven Effect. International Economic Review, 49(1), 223-254. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00478.x
  • Li, K., Fang, L., & He, L. (2020). The impact of energy price on CO2 emissions in China: A spatial econometric analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 706, 135942. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135942
  • Liu, Y., Hao, Y., & Gao, Y. (2017). The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment: Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 108(C), 271-280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.055
  • Lotfalipour, M. R., Falahi, M. A., & Ashena, M. (2010). Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuels consumption in Iran. Energy, 35(12), 5115-5120. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.08.004
  • Malik, M.Y., Latif, K., Khan, Z., Butt, H. Hussain, M., & Nadeem, M. A. (2020). Symmetric and asymmetric impact of oil price, FDI and economic growth on carbon emission in Pakistan: Evidence from ARDL and non-linear ARDL approach. Science of the Total Environment, 726, 138421. org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138421
  • Mensah, I. A., Sun, M., Gao, C., Omari-Sasu, A. Y., Zhu, D., Ampimah, B. C., & Quarcoo, A. (2019). Analysis on the nexus of economic growth, fossil fuel energy consumption, CO.sub.2 emissions and oil price in Africa based on a PMG panel ARDL approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228(1). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.281
  • Mert, M., & B¨olük, G. (2016). Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 23(21), 21669–21681. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7413-7
  • Odhiambo, N. M. (2009). Energy consumption and economic growth nexus in Tanzania: An ARDL bounds testing approach. Energy Policy, 37(2), 617-622. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.077
  • Oxelheim, L., & Ghauri, P. (2008). EU–China and the non-transparent race for inward FDI. Journal of Asian Economics, 19(4), 358-370. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2008.04.001
  • Pao, H.-T., & Tsai, C.-M. (2011). Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) ountries. Energy, 36(1), 685-693. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.041
  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. doi:10.1002/jae.616
  • Raihan, A., & Tuspekova, A. (2022). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between economic growth, renewable energy use, forested area, and carbon emissions in Malaysia. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances. 15. org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200096
  • Ren, S., Yuan, B., Ma, X., & Chen, X. (2014). International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: A case study of Chinas industrial sectors. China Economic Review, 28, 123-134. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2014.01.003
  • Salari, M., Javid, R.J., & Noghanibehambari, H. (2021). The nexus between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in the U.S. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69(C),182–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2020.12.007
  • Sato, S. (2014). Photoelectrochemical CO2 Reduction. Encyclopedia of Applied Electrochemistry, 25(8),1535-1538. DOI: 1007/978-1-4419-6996-5_491
  • Shahbaz, M., Nasir.; M. A., & Roubaud. D. (2018). Environmental degradation in France: The effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Economics, 74(C), 843-857. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.020
  • Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework. Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt, 281-314. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9
  • Udemba, E. N., Yalçıntaş, S. (2021). Interacting force of foreign direct invest (FDI), natural resource and economic growth in determining environmental performance: A nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) approach. Resources Policy, 73. org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102168
  • Zhang, C., & Zhou, X. (2016). Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 943-951. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.226
  • Zhang, Y., & Zhang, S. (2018). The impacts of GDP, trade structure, exchange rate and FDI inflows on China's carbon emissions. Energy Policy, 120(C), 347-353. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.056.
Green Development Management Studies
Volume 3, Issue 1 - Serial Number 5
April 2024
Pages 245-268

  • Receive Date 26 January 2024
  • Revise Date 16 March 2024
  • Accept Date 16 April 2024