Green Development Management Studies

Green Development Management Studies

Measuring the impact of the principles and design of the school environment on students' learning with an emphasis on biophilic architectural indicators (nature-oriented)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Ezzat ollah Sadeghi 1
Yavar Sadeghi 2
hajar khadivi 1
1 Teacher of the Education Office of Izeh city, Izeh, Iran
2 Teacher of the Education Office of Dehdez city, Dehdez, Iran
10.22077/jgmd.2023.6471.1035
Abstract
Schools are an example of learning environments whose design and type of architecture can be effective in students' learning. In this regard, biophilic architecture, can be a suitable model for investigation. The purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of biophilic architectural indicators on students' learning as a case study in the schools of Izeh city. The research method is descriptive-analytical and based on field studies using questionnaires. The validity of the questionnaire was conducted through the elites and the reliability was also confirmed with Cronbach's alpha greater than 0.70. The statistical population of the research is made up of the students of the second secondary level of Izeh city. the sample size was determined 194 people. Questioning analysis was done in spss software. The result of the test showed that biophilic architecture in the school environment can have a significant impact on learning from the perspective of students. The result confirmed that the presence of green spaces in the school with an average of 4.685, the school's access to natural sunlight with an average of 4.639 and inspiration from nature in the design of windows, doors, etc. with an average of 4.572 as the most important indicators. The impact of biophilic architecture on students' learning is known. Also, the result of the analysis of variance confirmed that there is a significant difference in the level of less than 0.05 among the students in terms of the effectiveness of biophilic architecture indicators in learning.
Keywords
school environment
learning
students
biophilic architecture
Izeh city
  • ارغیانی، مصطفی؛ صفار، محی الدین؛ مهوش، محمد. (1402). بررسی طراحی فضای آموزشی با رویکرد کاهش استرس با استفاده از طراحی بیوفیلیک (زیست گرا)، مجله فناوری آموزش، 17(2)، 449-468. https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2023.9338.2834
  • خانه شناس، فرین؛ حبیبی، پیمانه؛ ذاکریان، ابوالفضل. (1398). تأثیر الگوهای طراحی بیوفیلیک بر سلامتی و رفاه کارکنان: مرور سیستماتیک، مجله ارگونومی، 7(4)، 1-11. بیطرف، احسان؛ حبیب، فرح؛ ذبیحی، حسین. (1397). بومی سازی اصول معماری اکولوژیک و بیوفیلیک در طراحی مجتمع‌های مسکونی ایران در راستای ارتقای کیفیت آنها، مجله مدیریت شهری، 52(3): 205-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/jergon.7.4.1
  • شکرانی، محمد؛ نورایی، همایون. (1401). تحلیل و سطح‌بندی مناطق پانزده‌گانه کلان‌شهر اصفهان برمبنای رویکرد برنامه‌ریزی شهری بیوفیلیک با استفاده از روش سوارا، مجله پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی،54(3): 1107-1124. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2021.320908.1008275
  • صمدپور شهرک، مهسا؛ طاهباز، منصوره. (1400). بررسی راهکارهای ارتقای فضای باز مدارس ابتدایی دخترانه از نگاه دانش آموزان (نمونە ٔ موردی: شهر تبریز)، نشریه فناوری آموزش، 12(3)، 183-196. https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2018.2921.1740
  • صیاد، مهسا؛ سیل سپور، حوریه (1398). حضور طبیعت در طراحی فضاهای آموزشی کودکان با تاکید بر معماری بیوفیلیک، سومین کنفرانس بین المللی هنر، معماری و کاربردها، تهران. https://civilica.com/doc/968852
  • عظمتی، حمیدرضا؛ صباحی، سمانه؛ عظمتی، سعید. (1391). عوامل محیطی مؤثر بر رضایتمندی دانش آموزان از فضاهای آموزشی، مجله نقش جهان، 2(1)، 31-42. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1391.2.1.1.1
  • میرسعیدی، لیلا. (1390). مفاهیم، تعاریف و مؤلفه‌های پایداری در معماری و ساختمان، دومین همایش معماری پایدار، همدان. https://civilica.com/doc/144259
  • Beatley,T. (2011).Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature into Urban Design and Planning,Island Press, Washington.DC. https://landscaper.ir/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Biophilic-Cities.pdf
  • Emekci,S. (2022). Using Nature in Architecture: A perspective from Antoni Gaudi, European Journal of Science and Technology,34(2), 87-91. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1073073
  • Ghaziani, R., Lemon, M., & Atmodiwirjo, P. (2021). Biophilic design patterns for primary schools. Sustainability, 13(21), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112207
  • Joye, Y. (2011). Biophilic design aesthetics in art and design education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 45(2), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.45.2.0017
  • Kayıhan, K.S., (2018). Examination of biophilia phenomenon in the context of sustainable architecture. Lect. Notes Civ. Eng. 6,80-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63709-9_7
  • Kellert, S. (2016).Biophilic Urbanism: the Potential to Transform. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 5(1): 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-10-2015-0035
  • Kellert, S. R., & Heerwagen, J. H. (2008). Nature and Healing: The science, Theory, and promise of biophilic design. In R. Guenther & G. Vittori (Eds.), Sustainable Healthcare Architecture (pp. 77-102). Hoboken, Newjersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=ManAuhBT1BUC.
  • Khoshtinat, S., Shirvani, Ahmadreza. (2016). Inspirations from nature as a Method for Sustainable Architectural Design, 4th. international congress on civil engineering architecture and urban developmentAt: Iran. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310932490_Inspirations_from_nature_as_a_Method_for_Sustainable_Architectural_Design
  • Littke, H. (2016).Becoming Biophilic: Challenges and Opportunities for Biophilic Urbanism in Urban Planning Policy, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 5(1):15 – 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-10-2015-0036
  • Mardomi, K., & Delshad, M. (2010). Flexible Learning Environment. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism. 1 (1), 109-118.
  • Peters, T., & D’Penna, K. (2020). Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments: A critical review of literature and design recommendations. Sustainability, 12(17), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177064
  • Pradono,B. (2019). The Interiority of Proximity Between Nature and Architecture in Contemporary and Tropically Context with Cases Studies, Journal of Teknik Arsitektur, 3(2), 129-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.30822/artk.v3i2.212
  • Sommese, F., Badarnah, L., Ausiello,G. (2022). A critical review of biomimetic building envelopes: towards a bio-adaptive model from nature to architecture, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112850
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 169(4), 43-59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/renewable-and-sustainable-energy-reviews
  • Vallas, T., Courard, L. (2017). Using nature in architecture: Building a living house with mycelium and trees, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(3),318-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2017.05.003
  • Watchman, M., Demers, C. M., & Potvin, A. (2021). Biophilic school architecture in cold climates. Indoor and Built Environment, 30(5), 585-605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X20908308
  • Xu,Z., Chapuis, P., Bokey,L., Zhang, M. (2017). Nature and Architecture of the Puboprostatic Ligament: A Macro- and Microscopic Cadaveric Study Using Epoxy Sheet Plastination, Urology,110,261-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X20908308
  • Yang, W., Meyers, M., Ritchie,R. (2019). Structural architectures with toughening mechanisms in Nature: A review of the materials science of Type-I collagenous materials, Progress in Materials Science,103(2), 425-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.01.002
Green Development Management Studies
Volume 2, Issue 1 - Serial Number 3
April 2023
Pages 129-138

  • Receive Date 11 June 2023
  • Accept Date 26 September 2023